NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Journal of Special Education89
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 61 to 75 of 89 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bailey, Donald B., Jr.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1990
Early intervention professionals (N=95) rated their own knowledge and skills in 16 areas of competency. The paper analyzes the distinction between knowledge and skills, identification of item clusters, and changes in ratings over time. Findings provide partial support for the usefulness of self-ratings in the context of inservice education. (JDD)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Early Intervention, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J. – Journal of Special Education, 1990
The agreement between visual analysis and the results of the split-middle method of trend estimation was examined using a set of 24 stimulus graphs and 30 raters. Results revealed poor agreement between the two methods, and low sensitivity, specificity, and predictive ability for visual analysis in relation to statistical inferences. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Estimation (Mathematics), Evaluation Methods, Graphs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rotholz, David A.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1989
The Code for Instructional Structure and Student Academic Response--Special Education (CISSAR-SPED) is an observation system which assesses the ecobehavioral processes within learning environments. Use of CISSAR-SPED with 12 students with autism or developmental disabilities provided both molar and molecular descriptions of special education…
Descriptors: Autism, Classroom Observation Techniques, Developmental Disabilities, Ecological Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tindal, Gerald; Parker, Richard – Journal of Special Education, 1989
Eight direct scoring indices of written expression were intercorrelated, factor analyzed, and used to predict holistic judgments of writing samples of 172 middle-school students in compensatory/specialized education programs. Strongest predictors of holistic ratings were percentage of words correctly sequenced and percentage of correctly spelled…
Descriptors: Creative Writing, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sindelar, Paul T.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1988
Thirty-five studies on the efficacy of special class versus regular class placement for mildly handicapped students were reviewed for the power of their statistical tests. Twenty-one studies had adequate power to detect a large effect size but the power to detect a medium effect size was no better than chance. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Hypothesis Testing, Mainstreaming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linehan, Sharon Lynch; Brady, Michael P. – Journal of Special Education, 1995
The influence of assessment reports on special educators' instructional planning decisions was evaluated, with 86 educators of students with severe mental retardation. Compared to educators reading a developmental assessment report, educators reading a functional assessment report for the same student recommended less restrictive placements for…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Development, Severe Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gaylord-Ross, Robert; Chadsey-Rusch, Janis – Journal of Special Education, 1991
Measuring employment outcomes for persons with severe disabilities has gone from a focus on task performance in sheltered settings to measurement of a number of individual outcomes in supported employment settings. Measurement considerations for individual, group, and organizational variables are discussed. Use of more than one measurement…
Descriptors: Adults, Evaluation Methods, Measures (Individuals), Organizational Climate
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Peters, Mary T.; Heron, Timothy E. – Journal of Special Education, 1993
This article reviews use of the term "best practice" in special education and suggests that the term is misleading unless measurable criteria have been systematically applied. A proposed definition focuses on the theoretical basis for a procedure, integrity of the research design and extent of replication, consensus with literature, process and…
Descriptors: Definitions, Disabilities, Educational Practices, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haywood, H. Carl – Journal of Special Education, 1992
The introduction to this special issue on interactive assessment and special needs children draws a distinction between the term "interactive assessment" and the more limited "dynamic assessment," and comments that the six papers comprising this issue focus on dynamic assessment, in which there is actual teaching of cognitive…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Examiners, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tzuriel, David; Caspi, Naomi – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This study, with 26 deaf and 26 pair-matched hearing preschool children, first assessed their cognitive modifiability using dynamic and static-convention instruments, and then compared the factorial pattern of the cognitive measures in both groups. Results are interpreted according to the Structural Cognitive Modifiability and Mediated Learning…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Restructuring, Cognitive Structures, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haywood, H. Carl; Wingenfeld, Sabine A. – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This paper discusses dynamic/interactive approaches to psychological assessment based on the concept of induced change as a research tactic. Studies are reviewed showing how interactive assessment has yielded new knowledge in psychopathology; neuropsychology; learning disabilities; intelligence testing (in normal, deaf, and immigrant children);…
Descriptors: Change, Deafness, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pena, Elizabeth; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This study demonstrated the application of mediated learning experience to language assessment of primarily Puerto Rican and African-American children (n=50) in three Head Start classes. Results support the hypothesis that a task matching young children's socialization better differentiates between nondisabled and language-disordered children than…
Descriptors: Black Students, Evaluation Methods, Interpersonal Competence, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frisby, Craig L.; Braden, Jeffery P. – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This paper argues that the popularity of Reuven Feuerstein's Learning Potential Assessment Device and the Instrumental Enrichment program is based more on philosophical considerations than on technical adequacy. The critique uses semantic, logical, and empirical grounds to conclude that dynamic assessment is not a serious competitor to…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Educational Philosophy, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tzuriel, David – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This reply responds to a paper by Frisby and Braden (EC 604 792), which criticized dynamic assessment, especially Reuven Feuerstein's theory and methods. Six critical points are raised and supported with examples from recent research. Criticisms center on theoretical and philosophical misunderstandings as well as failure to consider supporting…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Educational Philosophy, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lidz, Carol S. – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This survey of 120 school psychologist trainers found that (1) there is widespread familiarity with dynamic assessment as a model of cognitive assessment; (2) few trainers are actually using the procedures; (3) most trainers do not mention it in their courses; and (4) trainers see the model's primary asset as its focus on learning processes rather…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6