NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20240
Since 20230
Since 2020 (last 5 years)0
Since 2015 (last 10 years)0
Since 2005 (last 20 years)4
Source
Journal of Special Education22
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 22 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goldstein, Jessica; Behuniak, Peter – Journal of Special Education, 2012
Federal and state policies require all students with significant cognitive disabilities to participate in state assessments and be included in measures of adequate yearly progress. Although these alternate assessments of grade-level content based on alternate achievement standards have been in place for several years, little is known about the…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Alternative Assessment, Focus Groups, Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Randall, Jennifer; Engelhard, George, Jr. – Journal of Special Education, 2010
This study examines the effects of two test modifications--resource guide and read-aloud--on the reading performance of students within the context of a large-scale statewide assessment in Georgia. Schools were both randomly selected and assigned to one of three possible test conditions: resource guide, read-aloud, or standard test condition.…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Disabilities, Grade 4, Grade 3
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tindal, Gerald; Yovanoff, Paul; Geller, Josh P. – Journal of Special Education, 2010
Students with significant disabilities must participate in large-scale assessments, often using an alternate assessment judged against alternate achievement standards. The development and administration of this type of assessment must necessarily balance meaningful participation with accurate measurement. In this study, generalizability theory is…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Alternative Assessment, Disabilities, Severe Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Caffrey, Erin; Fuchs, Douglas; Fuchs, Lynn S. – Journal of Special Education, 2008
The authors report on a mixed-methods review of 24 studies that explores the predictive validity of dynamic assessment (DA). For 15 of the studies, they conducted quantitative analyses using Pearson's correlation coefficients. They descriptively examined the remaining studies to determine if their results were consistent with findings from the…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Predictive Validity, Norm Referenced Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bricker, Diane; Gumerlock, Sarah – Journal of Special Education, 1988
A comprehensive three-level program evaluation plan assesses overall impact of early intervention programs through assessment of children's progress toward developmental milestones; quarterly child progress through administration of a program-relevant, criterion-referenced tool; and weekly child progress toward specific instructional objectives by…
Descriptors: Child Development, Criterion Referenced Tests, Developmental Programs, Developmental Tasks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, Hill M.; Lamon, William E. – Journal of Special Education, 1987
The paper describes a behavioral-ecological assessment system called AIMS (Assessment for Integration into Mainstream Settings) and presents the results of a comparative study of the responses of four Australian (N=179) and two U.S. (N=72) elementary teacher groups on two of the AIMS assessment instruments, the Social Behavior Standards Inventory…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Behavior Standards, Classroom Environment, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meyers, Joel; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1985
Process assessment is offered as an alternative frame of reference for conducting psychoeducational assessment. The research base is presented, as well as a specific model that focuses assessment on the characteristics of the task, the child, and the setting, as well as the interactions among three factors. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Models, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas – Journal of Special Education, 1986
The meta analysis explored how measuring special education student progress toward long-term vs. short-term goals affects achievement outcomes. Results indicated that when progress toward long-term goals was measured, unbiased effect sizes were higher than on probelike outcomes; when progress toward short-term goals was measured, the reverse was…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Telzrow, Cathy F. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Preliminary research suggests that the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) may be useful in identifying a variety of special needs in preschoolers, specific language disorders, and giftedness. Additional measures (such as measures of visual motor performance) may be appropriate in conjunction with the K-ABC. (CL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disabilities, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoge, Robert D. – Journal of Special Education, 1983
The paper addresses teacher-judgement measures of pupil behaviors, aptitudes, and achievement levels. Analyses relating to reliability and validity of the measures are reviewed. Conclusions are drawn regarding psychometric properties of these judgment measures, suggestions regarding future research on the measures, and statements about their place…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Aptitude Tests, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harber, Jean R. – Journal of Special Education, 1981
The utility of the procedures special educators apply in making decisions about the identification of handicapped individuals has not been thoroughly studied. The paper examines the utility of diagnostic decision making from the perspective of receiver operating curve analysis. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Decision Making, Disabilities, Disability Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Murphy, Robert J.; Bryan, Anne J. – Journal of Special Education, 1980
The article considers the use of multiple baseline and multiple probe designs in special education research. Multiple baseline evaluation designs across behaviors, instructional strategies, situations, and individuals are discussed. Multiple probe design advantages, such as cost effectiveness and short duration, are examined. (PHR)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McDermott, Paul A. – Journal of Special Education, 1980
To produce a greater degree of consistency and reliability in diagnosis of handicapped children, a system called multidimensional actuarial classification is presented for differential diagnosis of mental retardation, inadequate adaptive behavior, social maladjustment, academic under and overachievement, and learning disabilities. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maher, Charles A.; Barbrack, Christopher R. – Journal of Special Education, 1979
A conceptual perspective and set of principles are offered for the evaluation of special service programs in public school settings. Special service program evaluation is seen as a process of obtaining and reporting information on a program's adequacy, process, efficiency, and impact. (Author)
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barnett, David W.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1997
Reviews alternative ways to establish goals for early intervention for children with disabilities, based on ecological theory. The ecological foundations of early intervention are discussed and an overview of sampling tactics and dimensions is presented. Recommendations are made for using planned activities for intervention design. (CR)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Early Intervention, Ecological Factors
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2