Publication Date
In 2024 | 0 |
Since 2023 | 0 |
Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Keyboarding (Data Entry) | 3 |
Computers | 2 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
Motivation | 2 |
Performance Based Assessment | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Anxiety | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Educational Technology | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Performance Improvement… | 3 |
Author
Bartels, Lynn K. | 2 |
Nordstrom, Cynthia R. | 2 |
Culig, Kathryn M. | 1 |
Dickinson, Alyce M. | 1 |
Huitema, Bradley E. | 1 |
Mallo, Jason | 1 |
McGee, Heather M. | 1 |
Traxler, Anthony | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bartels, Lynn K.; Nordstrom, Cynthia R. – Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2012
We examined whether the reason offered for electronic performance monitoring (EPM) influenced participants' performance, stress, motivation, and satisfaction. Participants performed a data-entry task in one of five experimental conditions. In one condition, participants were not electronically monitored. In the remaining conditions, participants…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Motivation, Performance Technology, Performance Based Assessment
Mallo, Jason; Nordstrom, Cynthia R.; Bartels, Lynn K.; Traxler, Anthony – Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2007
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM) is a common technique used to record employee performance. EPM may include counting computer keystrokes, monitoring employees' phone calls or internet activity, or documenting time spent on work activities. Despite EPM's prevalence, no studies have examined how this management tool affects older workers--a…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Job Performance, Older Workers, Age Differences
McGee, Heather M.; Dickinson, Alyce M.; Huitema, Bradley E.; Culig, Kathryn M. – Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2006
This study examined whether high performers performed better (a) under individual and group incentive pay than under hourly pay and (b) under individual incentive pay than under group incentive pay. Participants were 11 college students. An ABCDC within-subject design was used in which A was hourly pay with individual feedback, B was individual…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Incentives, College Students, Higher Education