NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED563348
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2013
Pages: 229
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 978-1-3035-1459-3
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Using Compositional Writing Samples to Explore Student Usage Patterns in a Learning Management System
Kokensparger, Brian Jay
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
This study explored relationships between writing sample features and LMS usage patterns for 366 college students who enrolled in Theology courses, junior-level courses cross-listed with theology courses, or Senior Perspective Program courses in the fall semester of 2012. These hybrid courses were managed inside the Canvas(TM) learning management system. LMS usage log data, containing the URLs visited as well as date/time stamps, were processed to generate session metrics and URL token categories, which were further reduced to eight prominent features (Assignments, Conversations, Files, Grades, Modules, Topics, View, and Wiki). Writing samples were processed using the LIWC software, producing word counts and linguistic particle analysis data. These data were further reduced to writing sample metrics and rollup categories labeled as Pronouns, Articles, Verbs, Social, Cognitive, and Relativity. After students were ranked into quartiles in each category by course frequencies, with outliers receiving boundary rankings, they were pre-classified by their rankings in specific categories as students with Fast Clicker and High Times Out LMS usage patterns. Correlation mining was then performed among and across all writing sample and page views categories. Additional correlation mining was performed among courses classified as Files/Assignments, Assignments/Files, Modules/Assignments, and Files/Modules, and among writing samples classified into four groups based upon average word counts. These correlation tests revealed a clear relationship between writing sample features and LMS usage patterns, suggesting a possibility for building predictive models. This possibility is tempered, however, by the course design and writing sample requirements. The study further explored generating decision trees and applying them to new data from a similar course in the following semester. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A