NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Research Management Review144
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Maslach Burnout Inventory1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 121 to 135 of 144 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Parker, Linda E.; Clark, David L. – Research Management Review, 1990
Consequences of two university departments' dependence on fluctuating research funding and their responses to it are examined, focusing on juggling dependence-based problems with graduate student education, instrumentation needs, grant discontinuation, faculty recruitment, and planning. The combination of institutional decentralization and the…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Decentralization, Departments, Economic Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Olsen, Leslie A.; Beattie, Robert R. – Research Management Review, 1990
Institutions varied widely in amount and type of data collected in tracking research proposals. Many do not collect predicted data or much data of national interest. Most do not require prior approval of use of human subjects, recombinant DNA, or hazardous substances. Only one required certification of integrity of scholarship. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Collection, DNA, Genetic Engineering
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kostoff, Ronald N. – Research Management Review, 1992
The practice and methods of federal research impact assessment are described. Three areas of evaluation (selection of research project, research review, and postresearch assessment) are examined, and different evaluation methods (qualitative, retrospective, and quantitative) are compared. Peer evaluation, the most common assessment method, is seen…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Federal Aid, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hansen, Stephen L; Shisler, Clifford – Research Management Review, 1992
The role of the university research administrator has evolved from that of "mediator-expeditor" among faculty, university, and sponsor to that of regulator of the grants process. This has had a significant impact on the kinds of research administration jobs available, characteristics of research administrators, and nature and content of…
Descriptors: Administrator Characteristics, Administrator Role, Conferences, Employment Opportunities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lowman, Robert P. – Research Management Review, 1997
Programs that teach scientific ethics must maintain vigilance against scientific misconduct; prepare scientists to deal with ethical ambiguity; and stress the importance of consultation and consensus, adherence to accepted standards of evidence, and commitment to due process using procedures established in advance. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Ambiguity, Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Curriculum
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frankel, Mark S. – Research Management Review, 1997
A discussion of federal policy on research integrity and scientific misconduct chronicles the history of federal involvement in accountability in the scientific community, forms of intervention, determination of the boundaries of misconduct, and the rights of whistle blowers. Official definitions and standards are presented. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cheating, Civil Liberties, Federal Government, Federal Regulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Casey, James J., Jr. – Research Management Review, 1998
Differentiates between the legal functions that college- and university-sponsored research officers are required to perform and the quasi-legal functions in research administration. Introduces and discusses legal concepts integral to research administration, and offers practical pointers in carrying out both legal and quasi-legal functions.…
Descriptors: College Administration, Contracts, Higher Education, Intellectual Property
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Loper, Gerald D.; Sudermann, Frederick – Research Management Review, 1998
Describes the origins and first two years of a focused collaborative project involving Wichita State University (Kansas), the aviation industry, and state economic-development organizations. The center is industry-driven and reflects the industry's current technological needs. The arrangement can offer significant advantages to each stakeholder,…
Descriptors: Aerospace Industry, Aviation Technology, Government School Relationship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Easter, Linda M.; Shultz, Eileen L. – Research Management Review, 1998
To demystify the grant-seeking and proposal-writing process, two administrators at Kutztown University (Pennsylvania) began a standing committee to train, encourage, and help faculty members assist each other. The committee has offered collaboration, social support, and technical expertise; the result has been an increase in grant proposals and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Programs, Faculty Development, Grantsmanship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, Joe G.; Wohlpart, Alfred – Research Management Review, 1998
A national survey of college and university chief research officers conducted in July 1996 provided comparative data concerning the characteristics of research administration in a modern institution, including funding levels and sources, facilities and staff resources, and other program information. Data are grouped by institution type and sector.…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Facilities, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Research Management Review, 1998
Presnets the questionnaire used to survey college and university chief research officers in a July 1996 study, with response data summarized. The survey gathered information on the administrator's characteristics, research-funding levels and sources, costs, office functions (grant administration, research administration, ethical/legal oversight),…
Descriptors: Facilities, Financial Support, Grants, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dooley, Larry M. – Research Management Review, 1995
A survey of tenure-track faculty in the Texas A & M University college of education investigated attitudes concerning the environment for grantsmanship. Results indicate the need for a system providing faculty with assigned time for proposal development, provision of start-up money for competitive grant-writing, equal emphasis on grant writing…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Competition, Grantsmanship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Deborah L.; And Others – Research Management Review, 1995
A discussion of informed consent by human subjects in experimentation presents background on the consent issue, including federal requirements; lists factors that may affect a subject's ability to understand the consent document; and offers suggestions for preparing consent forms to ensure the subject's better comprehension. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Contracts, Experimental Groups, Federal Regulation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davis, Sharon K.; Lowry, Peggy S. – Research Management Review, 1995
A survey of 100 college and university preaward research administration offices investigated the status of evaluation of these programs. Results suggest formal program evaluation is not a high priority among research administrators. Only 16% used formal evaluation, 53% used ad hoc evaluation, and only 20% initiated or requested evaluation.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Attitudes, College Administration, Educational Trends
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dummer, George H. – Research Management Review, 1995
The ways in which accountability issues have affected federal-university relationships, particularly in the area of academic research, are examined. Lessons university administrators have learned since issuance of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21 in 1958, Congressional hearings on the operations of the National Institutes of Health…
Descriptors: Accountability, Compliance (Legal), Disclosure, Educational History
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10