Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 2 |
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Child Development | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLittle, Jeri L.; Frickey, Elise A.; Fung, Alexandra K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
Taking a test improves memory for that tested information, a finding referred to as the testing effect. Multiple-choice tests tend to produce smaller testing effects than do cued-recall tests, and this result is largely attributed to the different processing that the two formats are assumed to induce. Specifically, it is generally assumed that the…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Memory, Cognitive Processes, Recall (Psychology)
Hamamouche, Karina; Cordes, Sara – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
Throughout the life span, we are capable of representing quantities in the absence of language, or nonsymbolically. Additionally, over the course of development, we learn many symbolic measurement systems for representing quantities such as time and number. Despite substantial evidence of a relation between the acquisition of symbolic and…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Time Perspective, Measurement, Correlation
