NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ847011
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2009
Pages: 9
Abstractor: As Provided
ISSN: ISSN-0278-7393
Are Independent Probes Truly Independent?
Camp, Gino; Pecher, Diane; Schmidt, Henk G.; Zeelenberg, Rene
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v35 n4 p934-942 2009
The independent cue technique has been developed to test traditional interference theories against inhibition theories of forgetting. In the present study, the authors tested the critical criterion for the independence of independent cues: Studied cues not presented during test (and unrelated to test cues) should not contribute to the retrieval process. Participants first studied a subset of cues (e.g., "rope") that were subsequently studied together with a target in a 2nd study phase (e.g., "rope-sailing", "sunflower-yellow"). In the test phase, an extralist category cue (e.g., "sports", "color") was presented, and participants were instructed to recall an item from the study list that was a member of the category (e.g., "sailing", "yellow"). The experiments showed that previous study of the paired-associate word (e.g., "rope") enhanced category cued recall even though this word was not presented at test. This experimental demonstration of covert cuing has important implications for the effectiveness of the independent cue technique. (Contains 1 table and 1 footnote.)
American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Netherlands
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A