NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hu, Shouping; McCormick, Alexander C. – Research in Higher Education, 2012
Using data from the 2006 cohort of the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, we developed a student typology based on student responses to survey items on the National Survey of Student Engagement. We then examined the utility of this typology in understanding direct-assessment learning outcomes, self-reported gains, grade-point…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Liberal Arts, Classification, Student Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pike, Gary R.; Kuh, George D.; McCormick, Alexander C. – Research in Higher Education, 2011
This study examined the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement in educational activities inside and outside the classroom using data from the 2004 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Results indicated that learning community participation was positively and…
Descriptors: Institutional Characteristics, Learner Engagement, Student Participation, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pike, Gary R.; Kuh, George D.; McCormick, Alexander C.; Ethington, Corinna A.; Smart, John C. – Research in Higher Education, 2011
Calls for accountability in higher education are prompted in part by questions concerning whether colleges and universities use their resources effectively to promote student learning. Unfortunately, too little is known about whether money matters to desired outcomes of college. Using students' responses to the 2004 administration of the National…
Descriptors: Expenditures, College Students, Institutional Characteristics, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McCormick, Alexander C.; Pike, Gary R.; Kuh, George D.; Chen, Pu-Shih Daniel – Research in Higher Education, 2009
This study compares the explanatory power of the 2000 edition of Carnegie Classification, the 2005 revision of the classification, and selected variables underlying Carnegie's expanded 2005 classification system using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement's spring 2004 administration. Results indicate that the 2000 and 2005…
Descriptors: College Students, Classification, Comparative Analysis, Student Surveys