Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Information Technology | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Intervals | 1 |
| Medical Services | 1 |
| Randomized Controlled Trials | 1 |
| Research Design | 1 |
| Risk | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 1 |
Author
| Gurung, Tara | 1 |
| Mowatt, Graham | 1 |
| Pickard, Robert | 1 |
| Ramsay, Craig | 1 |
| Robertson, Clare | 1 |
| Sharma, Pawana | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRobertson, Clare; Ramsay, Craig; Gurung, Tara; Mowatt, Graham; Pickard, Robert; Sharma, Pawana – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
We describe our experience of using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool for randomised and non-randomised comparative studies. Objectives: (1) To assess time to complete RoB assessment; (2) To assess inter-rater agreement; and (3) To explore the association between RoB and treatment effect size. Methods: Cochrane risk of…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, Comparative Analysis
