NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xuhua Chang; Lei Gong; Yali Zhu – Research Evaluation, 2023
To promote university patent transfer (UPT) and technology diffusion, the Chinese government has implemented a series of economic incentives. One such incentive involves increasing the share rate of faculty inventors from 20% to 50%. We investigate whether such sharing arrangements are effective in encouraging patent disclosure by faculty…
Descriptors: Universities, Intellectual Property, Foreign Countries, Incentives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Beest, Wilke; Boon, Wouter P. C.; Andriessen, Daan; Pol, Harald; van der Veen, Gerrita; Moors, Ellen H. M. – Research Evaluation, 2022
This study explores the evaluation of research pathways of self-management health innovations from discovery to implementation in the context of practice-based research. The aim is to understand how a new process model for evaluating practice-based research provides insights into the implementation success of innovations. Data were collected from…
Descriptors: Self Management, Health, Innovation, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Razmgir, Maryam; Panahi, Sirous; Ghalichi, Leila; Mousavi, Seyed Ali Javad; Sedghi, Shahram – Research Evaluation, 2021
This article explores the models and frameworks developed on "research impact'. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of related literature through scoping study method. The present research investigates the nature, objectives, approaches, and other main attributes of the research impact models. It examines to analyze and classify models…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Models, Evaluation Methods, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Botha, L.; Grobbelaar, S. S.; Bam, W. G. – Research Evaluation, 2019
From the evaluation literature related to research and innovation policy, calls have long been made for improved evaluation processes especially where projects and programmes may be evaluated from a systems perspective. Drawing on the literature of innovation systems and innovation for inclusive development (I4ID) this research proposes a…
Descriptors: Universities, Higher Education, Technology Uses in Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Oliveira, Talita Moreira; Amaral, Livio; Pacheco, Roberto Carlos dos Santos – Research Evaluation, 2019
There is a growing interest in multi/inter/transdisciplinary (MIT-D) work, which requires increasing levels of knowledge and co-production interaction. Many studies have addressed this theme with different approaches such as the nature of transversal scientific subjects, the concept of knowledge integration, and the dynamics of research groups to…
Descriptors: Models, Evaluation, Graduate Study, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Saetnan, Ann Rudinow; Tøndel, Gunhild; Rasmussen, Bente – Research Evaluation, 2019
This qualitative case study of emergent practices in a multi-paradigmatic field at one department in Norway explores how performance metrics in science intra-act with staff composition and resource allocation, potentially affecting paradigm trends. Inspired by agential realism, we discuss four key metrics as the material core of an assemblage…
Descriptors: Computation, Models, Number Concepts, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walsh, Rachael; Moore, Robert F.; Doyle, Jamie Mihoko – Research Evaluation, 2018
To assist new scientists in the transition to independent research careers, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented an Early Stage Investigator (ESI) policy beginning with applications submitted in 2009. During the review process, the ESI designation segregates applications submitted by investigators who are within 10 years of…
Descriptors: Researchers, Public Policy, Financial Support, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petsakos, Athanasios; Hareau, Guy; Kleinwechter, Ulrich; Wiebe, Keith; Sulser, Timothy B. – Research Evaluation, 2018
This article examines how the estimated impacts of crop technologies vary with alternate methods and assumptions, and also discusses the implications of these differences for the design of studies to inform research prioritization. Drawing on international potato research, we show how foresight scenarios, realized by a multi-period global…
Descriptors: Agriculture, Research, Comparative Analysis, Models