NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 24 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kampfmann, Teresa; Bernert, Philip; Lang, Daniel J. – Research Evaluation, 2023
The number of real-world laboratories (RwLs) as research settings to address sustainability problems by using collaborative and experimental approaches has been growing steadily over the past years. RwLs are widely considered promising settings for the production of action-orientated knowledge in order to contribute solving wicked real-world…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Cooperation, Research, Laboratories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Laursen, Bethany K.; Motzer, Nicole; Anderson, Kelly J. – Research Evaluation, 2022
In many sectors and in many respects, interdisciplinarity has made progress in recent decades, but less so when it comes to evaluating interdisciplinary work. Challenges remain, especially regarding what counts as 'good' interdisciplinarity. While previous reviews describe broad trends contributing to these challenges, high-level observations are…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Evaluation, Trend Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bonaccorsi, Andrea; Chiarello, Filippo; Fantoni, Gualtiero – Research Evaluation, 2021
With the rise of the impact assessment revolution, governments and public opinion have started to ask researchers to give evidence of their impact outside the traditional audiences, i.e. students and researchers. There is a mismatch between the request to demonstrate the impact and the current methodologies for impact assessment. This mismatch is…
Descriptors: Humanities, Social Science Research, Researchers, Users (Information)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolfram, Dietmar; Wang, Peiling; Abuzahra, Fuad – Research Evaluation, 2021
Journals that adopt open peer review (OPR), where review reports of published articles are publicly available, provide an opportunity to study both review content characteristics and quantitative aspects of the overall review process. This study investigates two areas relevant to the quality assessment of manuscript reviews. First, do journal…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Horbach, Serge P. J. M. – Research Evaluation, 2021
The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a considerable impact on the scientific enterprise, including scholarly publication and peer-review practices. Several studies have assessed these impacts, showing among others that medical journals have strongly accelerated their review processes for COVID-19-related content. This has raised questions and…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Medicine, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dewaele, Alexis; Vandael, Kristof; Meysman, Stefan; Buysse, Ann – Research Evaluation, 2021
The number and type of collaborations between researchers and stakeholders has increased significantly. This responds to the demand from policymakers, funders, and citizens that researchers should help to tackle important social issues (e.g. climate change, healthy aging). However, there is little knowledge about how collaboration processes are…
Descriptors: Interaction, Social Science Research, Humanities, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McKenzie, Karen; Murray, Aja; Murray, George; Martin, Rachel – Research Evaluation, 2021
There is an increasing emphasis on the importance of research having an impact on policy and practice. This can be more difficult to evidence in intellectual disability services because of the wide range of stakeholders involved. We evaluated whether an impact questionnaire covering: knowledge production, capacity building, informing policy and…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Screening Tests, Intellectual Disability, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Razmgir, Maryam; Panahi, Sirous; Ghalichi, Leila; Mousavi, Seyed Ali Javad; Sedghi, Shahram – Research Evaluation, 2021
This article explores the models and frameworks developed on "research impact'. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of related literature through scoping study method. The present research investigates the nature, objectives, approaches, and other main attributes of the research impact models. It examines to analyze and classify models…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Models, Evaluation Methods, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mertkan, Sefika; Onurkan Aliusta, Gulen; Suphi, Nilgun – Research Evaluation, 2021
Intensified pressure to publish is a hallmark of a rapidly evolving higher education field where the faculty of any hue cannot avoid the 'publish or perish' treadmill. Growing need to publish more and to do so fast have resulted in the proliferation of pseudo scholarly publications many regards as 'predatory'. This article provides a systematic…
Descriptors: Authors, Writing for Publication, Periodicals, Deception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barlösius, Eva; Blem, Kristina – Research Evaluation, 2021
Although many studies have shown that reviewers particularly value the feasibility of a proposed project, very little attention has gone to how applicants try to establish the plausibility of their proposal's realization. With a sample of 335 proposals, we examined the ways applicants reason the feasibility of their projects and the kinds of…
Descriptors: Research Proposals, Authors, Persuasive Discourse, Feasibility Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mula-Flacón, Javier; Cruz-González, Cristina; Domingo Segovia, Jesús; Lucena Rodríguez, Carmen – Research Evaluation, 2021
The current academic assessment system is drawing a scenario based on neoliberal values. It has contributed to the perpetuation of gender inequalities. This systematic literature review aims to synthesize the most relevant research on the impact of neoliberalism on the professional identity of female academics. For this purpose, a systematized…
Descriptors: Women Faculty, Teacher Evaluation, Neoliberalism, Professional Identity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas, Duncan A.; Nedeva, Maria; Tirado, Mayra M.; Jacob, Merle – Research Evaluation, 2020
The current range and volume of research evaluation-related literature is extensive and incorporates scholarly and policy/practice-related perspectives. This reflects academic and practical interest over many decades and trails the changing funding and reputational modalities for universities, namely increased selectivity applied to institutional…
Descriptors: Institutional Evaluation, Evaluation Research, Universities, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Netz, Nicolai; Hampel, Svenja; Aman, Valeria – Research Evaluation, 2020
The internationalization and specialization of science confront scientists with opportunities and sometimes even a need to become internationally mobile during their careers. Against this background, we systematically reviewed empirical studies on the effects that mobility across national borders has on the careers of scientists. Using several…
Descriptors: Scientists, Career Development, Occupational Mobility, Overseas Employment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vanecek, Jiri; Pecha, Ondrej – Research Evaluation, 2020
This article compares the growth rates of Web of Science indexed research publications in 11 European countries from 2000 to 2015. The growth of publication output in the Czech Republic was very fast: the annual production increased more than threefold. However, the number of articles increased only 2.6-fold, whereas the number of proceedings…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Conferences (Gatherings), Conference Papers, Productivity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Lili; Wang, Xianwen; Piro, Fredrik Niclas; Philipsen, Niels J. – Research Evaluation, 2020
Public funding is believed to play an important role in the development of science and technology. However, whether public funding and, in particular, competitive funding from public agencies actually helps to increase scientific output (i.e. publications) remains a matter of debate. By analysing a dataset of co-publications between China and the…
Descriptors: Competition, Scientific Research, Financial Support, Public Agencies
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2