NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1212887
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2019
Pages: 10
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1091-367X
EISSN: N/A
Differences in Resting Metabolic Rate between BodyMetrix™ and Indirect Calorimetry in South African Adults
Krkeljas, Zarko; Engelbrecht, Louise; Terblanche, Elmarie
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, v23 n2 p159-168 2019
Accurate assessment of resting metabolic rate (RMR) is necessary for calorie-based recommendations in diet and exercise training interventions. BodyMetrix™ is an ultrasound-based device that provides an estimate of RMR based on body composition, but has not been proven valid or reliable. Therefore, we evaluated the agreement between Katch-McArdle prediction equation used by BodyMetrix™, with indirect calorimetry, Harris-Benedict, WHO, and Sabounchi prediction equations of RMR. In total, 32 men and 22 women were measured for body composition via BodyMetrix™ and RMR via indirect calorimetry. All prediction equations demonstrated significantly lower RMR values (p < 0.001) relative to indirect calorimetry. Katch-McArdle equation strongly correlated with other prediction equations (p < 0.001), and had a moderate (r = 0.658, p < 0.001) correlation with indirect calorimetry. There was a tendency toward underestimation for obese individuals. Therefore, we suggest that estimates from BodyMetrix™ may be used as a relative, rather than an absolute measure of RMR.
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: South Africa
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A