NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bernstein, Brian O.; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021
Academic acceleration of intellectually precocious youth is believed to harm overall psychological well-being even though short-term studies do not support this belief. Here we examine the long-term effects. Study 1 involves three cohorts identified before age 13, then longitudinally tracked for over 35 years: Cohort 1 gifted (top 1% in ability,…
Descriptors: Acceleration (Education), Gifted, Well Being, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Park, Gregory; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013
Using data from a 40-year longitudinal study, the authors examined 3 related hypotheses about the effects of grade skipping on future educational and occupational outcomes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). From a combined sample of 3,467 mathematically precocious students (top 1%), a combination of exact and propensity…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Academically Gifted, Acceleration (Education), Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wai, Jonathan; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P.; Steiger, James H. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010
Two studies examined the relationship between precollegiate advanced/enriched educational experiences and adult accomplishments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In Study 1, 1,467 13-year-olds were identified as mathematically talented on the basis of scores [greater than or equal to] 500 (top 0.5%) on the math section…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Educational Experience, Educational Opportunities, Student Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wai, Jonathan; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009
The importance of spatial ability in educational pursuits and the world of work was examined, with particular attention devoted to STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) domains. Participants were drawn from a stratified random sample of U.S. high schools (Grades 9-12, N = 400,000) and were tracked for 11+ years; their…
Descriptors: Spatial Ability, Role, Development, Expertise
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wai, Jonathan; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005
This study tracks intellectually precocious youths (top 1%) over 20 years. Phase 1 (N = 1,243 boys, 732 girls) examines the significance of age 13 ability differences within the top 1% for predicting doctorates, income, patents, and tenure at U.S. universities ranked within the top 50. Phase 2 (N = 323 men, 188 women) evaluates the robustness of…
Descriptors: Creativity, Youth, Longitudinal Studies, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shea, Daniel L.; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001
At age 13, students scoring at the top 0.5% in general intelligence completed the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT), Mathematics and Verbal subtests, and the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) Space Relations (SR) and Mechanical Reasoning (MR) subtests. It appears that spatial ability assessments can complement contemporary talent search procedures.…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Adolescents, Gifted, Individual Differences