Descriptor
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Research | 2 |
| Teacher Effectiveness | 2 |
| Administrator Evaluation | 1 |
| Administrator Responsibility | 1 |
| Economics Education | 1 |
| Incentives | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Rewards | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Economic Education | 2 |
Author
| Needham, Douglas | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNeedham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Ways for improving college level faculty evaluation are examined. Three criteria are discussed: research performance, teaching performance, and administrative performance. Desirable features of faculty rewards systems are also described. (RM)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedNeedham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Describes a theoretical model for evaluating college faculty that can improve faculty performance and resource allocation. Characteristics of the model, appropriate evaluation criteria for teaching, research, administrative, and other activities, and departmental procedures for determining evaluation criteria and weights are discussed. (AM)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Economics Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
