Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| College Freshmen | 3 |
| Reading Comprehension | 3 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Educational Experiments | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Generative Grammar | 1 |
| Group Activities | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of College Reading… | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Iran | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textZoghi, Masoud; Mustapha, Ramlee; Maasum, Tg. Nor Rizan Mohd. – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2010
The present study was an attempt to probe into the feasibility and effectiveness of a reading instructional approach called MCSR--Modified Collaborative Strategic Reading. Based on a pretest-posttest design, MCSR was implemented with 42 university-level EFL freshmen. They met once a week and received EFL reading instruction according to MCSR for…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Reading Comprehension, Student Attitudes
Van Blerkom, Dianna L.; Van Blerkom, Malcolm L.; Bertsch, Sharon – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2006
One hundred nine college students participated in an experiment that involved reading a passage and responding to a 20-item multiple choice test. The students were randomly assigned to one of four groups. The four conditions involved reading and copying, reading and highlighting, reading and taking notes, and reading and generating questions.…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Educational Experiments, Multiple Choice Tests, Learning Strategies
McCabe, Patrick P.; Kraemer, Linda A.; Miller, Paul M.; Parmar, Rene S.; Ruscica, Marybeth B. – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2006
This study had two purposes. One was to investigate the effect of text format on underachieving first-year college students' self-efficacy for reading; the second was to compare self-efficacy ratings with subsequent reading comprehension. Seventy-six students in a university learning support services program at a large Northeastern university…
Descriptors: Underachievement, College Freshmen, Student Attitudes, Self Efficacy
