Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Freshmen | 2 |
| Introductory Courses | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Educational Experiments | 1 |
| Generative Grammar | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| High Risk Students | 1 |
| Learning Strategies | 1 |
| Matched Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of College Reading… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textMoore, Randy; LeDee, Olivia – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2006
Although first-year students in Supplemental Instruction (SI) earned similar average numerical-grades in an introductory biology course as non-SI students, their grade distributions were different: SI students earned fewer D's and F's than non-SI students. SI students who earned A's and B's had similar admissions scores as those who earned D's and…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Biology, College Freshmen, Academic Achievement
Van Blerkom, Dianna L.; Van Blerkom, Malcolm L.; Bertsch, Sharon – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2006
One hundred nine college students participated in an experiment that involved reading a passage and responding to a 20-item multiple choice test. The students were randomly assigned to one of four groups. The four conditions involved reading and copying, reading and highlighting, reading and taking notes, and reading and generating questions.…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Educational Experiments, Multiple Choice Tests, Learning Strategies
