Publication Date
In 2024 | 0 |
Since 2023 | 0 |
Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Achievement Tests | 3 |
At Risk Students | 3 |
Elementary School Students | 3 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
Reading Tests | 2 |
Response to Intervention | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Applied School… | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Parker, David C.; Cormier, Damien C. – Journal of Applied School Psychology, 2019
Data from a large-scale math intervention program were used to evaluate the degree to which implementation fidelity (IF) and interventionist content knowledge were associated with student outcomes. Data were available for 33 interventionists serving 658 students in Grades 4-6 across one school year. A series of multilevel models were fit to the…
Descriptors: Intervention, Program Implementation, Fidelity, Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Keller-Margulis, Milena; McQuillin, Samuel D.; Castañeda, Juan Javier; Ochs, Sarah; Jones, John H. – Journal of Applied School Psychology, 2018
Multitiered systems of support depend on screening technology to identify students at risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of a computer-adaptive test and latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to identify students at risk in reading with focus on the use of this methodology to characterize student performance in screening.…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Multivariate Analysis, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Haas, Lindsay B.; Stickney, Eric M.; Ysseldyke, James E. – Journal of Applied School Psychology, 2016
The authors examined the extent to which classroom teachers in naturalistic settings used a Goal-Setting Tool to set instructional goals for struggling students, the kinds of goals they set, their progress monitoring practices with and without goals, and the extent to which students gain more when a goal-setting tool is used. The goal-setting tool…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Learning Disabilities, Student Educational Objectives, Goal Orientation