Descriptor
| Editing | 1 |
| Group Discussion | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Teacher Attitudes | 1 |
| Teacher Expectations of… | 1 |
Source
| English in Texas | 1 |
Author
| Etheridge, Chuck | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedEtheridge, Chuck – English in Texas, 1995
Argues that peer evaluation can work effectively if the teacher realizes that success should be measured more in long-term, cumulative benefits than in the immediate success or failure. Uses a fictitious scenario involving a teacher's first efforts at peer editing to make the above point. (TB)
Descriptors: Editing, Group Discussion, Peer Evaluation, Secondary Education
