NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Descriptor
Achievement Tests2
Criterion Referenced Tests2
Test Items2
Comparative Analysis1
Context Effect1
Difficulty Level1
Higher Education1
Mastery Tests1
Models1
Reading Comprehension1
Test Construction1
Test Reliability1
Test Validity1
Theories1
More ▼
Source
Educational and Psychological…2
Author
Bennett, Judith A.1
Haladyna, Thomas M.1
Hanna, Gerald S.1
Roid, G. H.1
Publication Type
Journal Articles1
Opinion Papers1
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 2 results Save | Export
A Comparison of Objective-Based and Modified-Bormuth Item Writing Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roid, G. H.; Haladyna, Thomas M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Two techniques for writing achievement test items to accompany instructional materials are contrasted: writing items from statements of instructional objectives, and writing items from semi-automated rules for transforming instructional statements. Both systems resulted in about the same number of faulty items. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Difficulty Level
Instructional Sensitivity Expanded.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hanna, Gerald S.; Bennett, Judith A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
The presently viewed role and utility of measures of instructional sensitivity are summarized. A case is made that the rationale for the assessment of instructional sensitivity can be applied to all achievement tests and should not be restricted to criterion-referenced mastery tests. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Context Effect, Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests