NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guo, Boliang; Aveyard, Paul; Dai, Xiaoyang – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2009
The Wechsler intelligence test has four factors representing four components of intellectual function. In China, there are marked cultural, educational, and economic disparities between rural and urban dwellers, which could lead to cultural bias. The aim of this study was to apply the four-factor structure to responses to the Chinese Intelligence…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Young Children, Factor Structure, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Watkins, Marley W.; Wilson, Sharise M.; Kotz, Kasey M.; Carbone, Maria C.; Babula, Teresa – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
Factor analysis was applied to the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) scores of 432 Pennsylvania students referred for evaluation for special education services to determine the factor structure of the WISC-IV with this population. A first-order, four-factor oblique solution that mirrored that found in the WISC-IV…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Intelligence Tests, Factor Analysis, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Taylor, Ronald L.; Ziegler, Edward W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
Spearman's general intelligence, or "g" factor, was investigated in a sample of 189 Black, 184 Hispanic, and 187 White children aged 6-11. The magnitude and loadings of factors on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) were similar for all three groups. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Black Students, Children, Elementary Education, Ethnic Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reynolds, Cecil R.; Harding, Richard E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
Six methods of measuring factorial similarity were compared with regard to outcome based on two large data sets, one for an intelligence test and the other for a personality test. All indexes yielded comparable results. Comparing factors determined at random, all indexes yielded comparable results leading to a conclusion of dissimilarity.…
Descriptors: Correlation, Elementary Education, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silverstein, A. B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
The intercorrelations among the 12 subtests of the WISC-R were analyzed for each of the 11 age groups in the standardization sample. Clusters were found that corresponded to the verbal and performance Scales. There was also some evidence of a third group of subtests, drawn from both scales. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Cluster Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence Tests, Performance Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mason, Elizabeth M.; Wenck, L. Stanley – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1989
Cognitive differences between 987 LD children and 178 EH children in public schools on a psychoeducational assessment battery were studied, and differences in factor structure were investigated. Caution is suggested in interpreting the results of multivariate statistical analyses, which indicated heterogeneity in the matrices of LD and EH…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slate, John R.; Jones, Craig H. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Two studies involving 89 children were conducted to evaluate the validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) with African American students undergoing special education evaluations. Results were highly correlated with previously determined IQs, and the factor structure of the WISC-III was generally supported.…
Descriptors: Black Students, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kamphaus, Randy W.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1994
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test 3 models of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III (2-, 3-, and 4-factor conceptualizations) for 11 age groups with 200 subjects per age group. The four-factor model is somewhat supported, but its theoretical or clinical importance is unclear. (SLD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Correlation, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maller, Susan J.; Konold, Timothy R.; Glutting, Joseph J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998
Whether the measurement of intelligence by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III (WISC-III) differs for children who exhibit inappropriate test-taking behavior was studied empirically with 247 inappropriate behavior and 515 appropriate behavior children. Results suggest that the factor index and full-scale IQ may have different meanings…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Children, Factor Structure, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cramer, Kenneth M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998
Whether the one- or two-factor Wechsler or weighted sum scores (WSS) structural models adequately fit the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III (WISC-III) covariance matrices was studied with samples of 2200 and 1118 children from previous studies. Both the WSS and supplemented models provided better fit than Wechsler's model but still…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Structure, Goodness of Fit, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watkins, Marley W.; Greenawalt, Chris G.; Marcel, Catherine M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2002
Applied factor analysis to the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) scores for 505 gifted students, to evaluate the construct validity of the WISC-III with this population. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that subtests that emphasize speed of reading are not valid for gifted children and suggest that an…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Factor Analysis