Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Least Squares Statistics | 1 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
| Outcomes of Treatment | 1 |
| Research Design | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| Testing | 1 |
Author
| Lix, Lisa M. | 2 |
| Deering, Kathleen N. | 1 |
| Fouladi, Rachel T. | 1 |
| Keselman, H. J. | 1 |
| Manivong, Phongsack | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkLix, Lisa M.; Deering, Kathleen N.; Fouladi, Rachel T.; Manivong, Phongsack – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2009
This study considers the problem of testing the difference between treatment and control groups on m [greater than or equal to] 2 measures when it is assumed a priori that the treatment group will perform better than the control group on all measures. Two procedures are investigated that do not rest on the assumptions of covariance homogeneity or…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Outcomes of Treatment, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedLix, Lisa M.; Keselman, H. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998
Comparison of six procedures to test for location equality among two or more groups when population variances are heterogeneous suggests that, when the variance homogeneity and normality assumptions are not satisfied, and the design is unbalanced, the use of any of these test statistics with the usual least squares estimators is not recommended.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Estimation (Mathematics), Least Squares Statistics, Research Design
