Examines the pros and cons of asking students to evaluate classroom instruction. Reports on an administrator survey, which suggested that administrators believe the process should be retained. Suggests that attention be focused on developing evaluation instruments tailored to various teaching situations and on the timing of the evaluations. (DMM)

Reports on a survey of 117 full-time faculty and 36 academic administrators in six rural Washington community colleges conducted to assess perceptions of current and ideal purposes and methods of faculty evaluation. Reveals a high positive relationship between faculty and administrator attitudes. Includes a literature review. (AYC)

Argues that faculty evaluation should utilize multiple methods including evidence of student learning and peer, student, self-, and administrative evaluation. Suggests that administrative evaluation involve classroom observation of teacher and student behavior, plus pre- and postobservation conferences to develop plans for improvement. (DMM)

Describes a study of posttenure faculty review in community colleges in the north central United States, indicating that 70 percent of 610 respondents had systems for posttenure review. Discusses evaluation criteria; outcomes and problems associated with the review process; perceptions regarding effectiveness and benefit of posttenure evaluation;…

Reviews the literature on faculty evaluation to define how different purposes and competing values have produced two approaches. A procedural approach relies upon both self-evaluation and appraisals by peers, administrators, and students. The developmental approach rests upon teaching portfolios, dossiers, and self-evaluations. Contains 23…