Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Administrator Attitudes | 5 |
| Community Colleges | 5 |
| Evaluation Methods | 5 |
| Two Year Colleges | 4 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 2 |
| Administrator Evaluation | 1 |
| Administrator Surveys | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
| Department Heads | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Community College Review | 5 |
Author
| Blankenberger, Bob | 1 |
| Ciscell, Robert E. | 1 |
| Franklin, Doug | 1 |
| Gwalamubisi, Yoswa | 1 |
| Hammons, James | 1 |
| Piland, William E. | 1 |
| Thomas, Wanda | 1 |
| Young, Raymond J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Illinois | 1 |
| Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkFranklin, Doug; Blankenberger, Bob – Community College Review, 2016
Objective: This study seeks to determine the nature of current program evaluation practices for learning assistance centers (LACs), the practices being used for program evaluation, and whether LAC directors believe their practices are appropriate for evaluating program effectiveness. Method: We conducted a survey (n = 61) of community college LAC…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Administrators, Administrator Attitudes, Learning Laboratories
Peer reviewedPiland, William E. – Community College Review, 1987
Reports on the results of an evaluation of the Illinois Community College Board's recognition process, by which community colleges are judged to be in compliance with state standards. Discusses administrators' perceptions of the effectiveness of the preparation, on-site visit, and reporting phases of the recognition process. Suggests enhancements.…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Community Colleges, Compliance (Legal), Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedCiscell, Robert E. – Community College Review, 1987
Examines the pros and cons of asking students to evaluate classroom instruction. Reports on an administrator survey, which suggested that administrators believe the process should be retained. Suggests that attention be focused on developing evaluation instruments tailored to various teaching situations and on the timing of the evaluations. (DMM)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedYoung, Raymond J.; Gwalamubisi, Yoswa – Community College Review, 1986
Reports on a survey of 117 full-time faculty and 36 academic administrators in six rural Washington community colleges conducted to assess perceptions of current and ideal purposes and methods of faculty evaluation. Reveals a high positive relationship between faculty and administrator attitudes. Includes a literature review. (AYC)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHammons, James; Thomas, Wanda – Community College Review, 1980
Describes a study of performance appraisals of department chairpersons focusing on: (1) the percentage of colleges evaluating chairpersons; (2) methods and criteria used; (3) chairperson attitudes toward existing and desirable appraisal systems; (4) the differences in chairpersons' attitudes among academic disciplines; and (5) the value of…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Community Colleges, Department Heads
