Publication Date
In 2024 | 0 |
Since 2023 | 0 |
Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Advocacy | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Change | 1 |
Childrens Rights | 1 |
Ethnography | 1 |
Evaluation Problems | 1 |
International Programs | 1 |
Nongovernmental Organizations | 1 |
Objectives | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Arensman, Bodille | 2 |
van Waegeningh, Cornelie | 1 |
van Wessel, Margit | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Arensman, Bodille – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Advocacy outcomes are not self-evident. Identifying advocacy outcomes is extremely difficult because they are often intangible, arising from (personal) interactions, and they are not always traceable. This challenges conventional evaluation methods, which is recognized in the advocacy evaluation literature. However, current evaluation methods…
Descriptors: Advocacy, Outcome Measures, Objectives, Evaluation Methods
Arensman, Bodille; van Waegeningh, Cornelie; van Wessel, Margit – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Theory of change (ToC) is currently "the" approach for the evaluation and planning of international development programs. This approach is considered especially suitable for complex interventions. We question this assumption and argue that ToC's focus on cause-effect logic and intended outcomes does not do justice to the recursive nature…
Descriptors: Theories, Change, Program Evaluation, Advocacy