Publication Date
In 2024 | 0 |
Since 2023 | 0 |
Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Clinical Experience | 3 |
Feedback (Response) | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Curriculum | 2 |
Medical Students | 2 |
Physicians | 2 |
Content Validity | 1 |
Discourse Analysis | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Evaluation Utilization | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Advances in Health Sciences… | 3 |
Author
Archer, Julian | 1 |
Davies, Helena | 1 |
Dornan, Tim | 1 |
Graham, Jennifer | 1 |
Heard, Shelley | 1 |
Norcini, John | 1 |
Peters, Claudia M. M. | 1 |
Southgate, Lesley | 1 |
Stokking, Karel M. | 1 |
de Ru, J. Alexander | 1 |
ten Cate, Olle Th. J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
van de Ridder, J. M. Monica; Peters, Claudia M. M.; Stokking, Karel M.; de Ru, J. Alexander; ten Cate, Olle Th. J. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2015
Feedback is considered important to acquire clinical skills. Research evidence shows that feedback does not always improve learning and its effects may be small. In many studies, a variety of variables involved in feedback provision may mask either one of their effects. E.g., there is reason to believe that the way oral feedback is framed may…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Medical Students, Positive Reinforcement, Negative Reinforcement
Graham, Jennifer; Dornan, Tim – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2013
"Curricula-in-action" generally differ from "official" curricula. That is particularly true of clerkship curricula because the practising doctors who supervise medical students' clinical activities are only secondarily educators. Clerkship education is evaluated, however, according to benchmarks set by official curricula.…
Descriptors: Curriculum, Medical Students, Clinical Experience, Measurement
Archer, Julian; Norcini, John; Southgate, Lesley; Heard, Shelley; Davies, Helena – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2008
Purpose: To design, implement and evaluate a multisource feedback instrument to assess Foundation trainees across the UK. Methods: mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool) was modified from SPRAT (Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool), an established multisource feedback (360 [degree]) instrument to assess more senior doctors, as part of a blueprinting…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Evaluation Methods, Content Validity, Tests