NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGuire, Michael D. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
It is argued that research testing the reliability and validity of college and university reputational studies should be conducted, a concern not raised by consumers and publishers. Two studies of "America's Best Colleges," published by "U.S. News and World Report," raise questions about the guide's validity and suggest that…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Endo, Jean J. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Offers guidelines for developing a general-purpose fact book for an individual college or university, including: initial considerations of purpose, context for publication, issue orientation, and organization; content issues; inclusion of adequate information on all major topics addressed; and logistical or presentation considerations. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Higher Education, Information Dissemination, Information Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tomlinson, Ann W. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Describes evolution of fact books at the University of Southern Mississippi, highlighting strategies for maintaining and enhancing its utility to users. Issues discussed include four audience considerations (context, customer, distribution, readability for middle-aged readers), format (fact sheet, pamphlet, pocket book, electronic fact book,…
Descriptors: College Administration, Higher Education, Information Dissemination, Information Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, James A. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Advice is offered on making the college or university fact book readable and appealing. Issues discussed include: choice of hardware and software for desktop publishing, balance, layout, use of graphics, typefaces and styles, text alignment, and format. Lists of resources, associations, seminars, and publications that may be useful are appended.…
Descriptors: College Administration, Computer Software, Computers, Desktop Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morse, Robert J.; Gilbert, Jersey – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Two representatives of popular magazines that publish controversial rankings of colleges and universities respond to criticism of the rankings. Issues addressed include the need for third-party comparisons, the importance of institutional reputation, cooperation with the higher education community, changing methodology, data integrity, reader…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoeritz, Kimberley; And Others – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Four major publishers of college guidebooks respond to the concerns of colleges and universities about the guides, the information they contain, and the demand for the information. Specific issues addressed include development of a standardized survey response, data integrity and validity, specialized information needs, publisher-institution…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McLaughlin, Josetta S.; McLaughlin, Gerald W. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Concerns about published comparisons of colleges and universities are organized into a framework to guide further research. A systematic method for addressing specific issues about the guides is presented, and the environment in which the guides are used is examined. Research needed to assure that the guides make a valued contribution and are fair…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Data Processing