NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lankes, R. David – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 2020
Library science is getting harder to teach. The variety in libraries of all types is increasing as more and more mold themselves to their communities rather than field-wide norms. How can library science education change to meet the new variety, and the variety in a post-neutrality world? The author proposes new metrics for evaluating the…
Descriptors: Library Education, Educational Change, Program Effectiveness, Evaluation Criteria
Brannon, Sian – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 2014
Fieldwork exists as a component of many library schools' curricula. Site supervisors, students, and the schools themselves all play a role. A final part of most fieldwork experiences involves the use of an evaluation form filled out by a site supervisor about the student. In this study, forty seven evaluation forms were collected and analyzed…
Descriptors: Field Experience Programs, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Needs, Information Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blake, Virgil L. P.; Tjoumas, Renee – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1990
Discusses research as a criterion for library and information science faculty assessment and reviews the literature pertaining to faculty work patterns, evaluation criteria, assessing the quality of research, and publication productivity. Guidelines for evaluating the quality of research publications are presented, and alternatives to current…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanford, Serena W. – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1997
Investigates the impact of asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) technology in an interactive environment providing distance education in library and information science at two San Jose State University (California) sites. The main purpose of the study was to develop a reliable and valid evaluation instrument. Contains 6 tables. (Author/AEF)
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Computer Uses in Education, Distance Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watson-Boone, Rebecca; Weingand, Darlene – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1996
This research asked deans of schools of library and information science with American Library Association (ALA) accredited programs to rate typical effectiveness indicators one might use to evaluate a school. Results are compared with a previous study that examined opinions of the ALA accreditation committee, other administrators, alumni, and…
Descriptors: Academic Deans, Accreditation (Institutions), Administrators, Alumni
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Powell, Ronald R.; Johnson, Nancy Becker – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1987
Provides historical background on education for research librarianship, and reports the findings of the Council on Library Resources as to necessary skills for research librarians. A program at the University of Michigan which is modeled on these findings is described and evaluated. (CLB)
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, College Environment, Competency Based Education, Computer Literacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rehman, Sajjad ur – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1994
Discussion of changes in the criteria by which faculty preparedness is evaluated focuses on a study of six graduate programs of library education in Pakistan that evaluated faculty based on academic qualifications, professional experience, and research and publication credentials. Shortcomings are discussed, and remedial measures are suggested,…
Descriptors: Change, Developing Nations, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Biggs, Mary; Bookstein, Abraham – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1988
Describes a survey that asked 45 library school faculty to identify the criteria that characterize high quality masters programs. The findings discussed include differences in opinions of faculty in doctoral and non-doctoral granting schools, and attitudes toward teaching quality and responsiveness to current issues as appropriate criteria. (13…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Curriculum Evaluation, Doctoral Programs, Educational Objectives