Descriptor
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| Court Judges | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Racial Discrimination | 1 |
| Reverse Discrimination | 1 |
| Rhetoric | 1 |
Author
| LaRue, L. H. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Bakke v Regents of University… | 1 |
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLaRue, L. H.; And Others – Washington and Lee Law Review, 1981
Justice Lewis Powell's opinion on the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is studied as an act of persuasion and a piece of rhetoric. A comment by Jan Deutch and a response by James B. White are included. (Available from: Washington and Lee University School of Law, Lexington, VA 24550, $5.00) (MLW)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Judges, Court Litigation
