NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in…148
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 148 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas, Damon; Moore, Robbie; Rundle, Olivia; Emery, Sherridan; Greaves, Robyn; te Riele, Kitty; Kowaluk, Andy – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Assessment is a central feature of student learning in higher education and has a strong influence on the student experience. Accordingly, the appropriate communication of assessment aims is a priority for all higher education institutions. This study proposes an analytical framework for the interpretation and creation of assessments across higher…
Descriptors: Models, Higher Education, Evaluation Methods, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vierula, Jonna; Haavisto, Elina; Hupli, Maija; Talman, Kirsi – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
Higher education student selection has significant societal, institutional and individual impacts. Thousands of applicants apply only for nursing, one of the major higher education disciplines. As the nursing profession is characterised by cognitive requirements, higher education institutions assess the learning skills of nursing applicants.…
Descriptors: Nursing Students, Learning Strategies, Admission Criteria, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lok, Beatrice; McNaught, Carmel; Young, Kenneth – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016
The tension between criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessment is examined in the context of curriculum planning and assessment in outcomes-based approaches to higher education. This paper argues the importance of a criterion-referenced assessment approach once an outcomes-based approach has been adopted. It further discusses the…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Outcome Based Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bader, Monika; Burner, Tony; Hoem Iversen, Sarah; Varga, Zoltan – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Despite the crucial role that students play in formative assessment practices, student perspectives on such practices are relatively under-researched. Through a qualitative analysis of 128 reflection notes written by student teachers of English, this article investigates the students' perceptions of formative feedback as part of portfolio…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Portfolio Assessment, Portfolios (Background Materials), Preservice Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Way, Kïrsten A.; Burrell, Lisa; D'Allura, Louise; Ashford-Rowe, Kevin – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
Authentic assessment has theorised benefits for student outcomes in higher education. More needs to be done, however, to empirically test relationships between the critical elements of authenticity and student outcomes, particularly in online learning environments. In this paper we examine whether an online simulation-based learning and assessment…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Online Courses, Integrated Learning Systems, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sefcik, Lesley; Bedford, Simon; Czech, Peter; Smith, Judith; Yorke, Jonathan – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
External referencing of assessment and students' achievement standards is a growing priority area within higher education, which is being pressured by government requirements to evidence outcome attainment. External referencing benefits stakeholders connected to higher education by helping to assure that assessments and standards within courses…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Academic Achievement, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jackson, Denise – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014
Despite acknowledgement of the benefits of self-assessment in higher education, disparity between student and academic assessments, with associated trends in overrating and underrating, plagues its meaningful use, particularly as a tool for formal assessment. This study examines self-assessment of capabilities in certain employability skills in…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Employment Potential, Job Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stenalt, Maria Hvid; Lassesen, Berit – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
This is a systematic review conducted to explore the primary research literature on student agency in higher education, as well as links between student agency and student learning. Out of more than 2,300 results, 42 articles published between 1980 and 2021 were assessed. Of these, 29 studies were included in a narrative review based on their…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Students, Personal Autonomy, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Irwin, Brian; Hepplestone, Stuart – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
There have been calls in the literature for changes to assessment practices in higher education, to increase flexibility and give learners more control over the assessment process. This article explores the possibilities of allowing student choice in the format used to present their work, as a starting point for changing assessment, based on…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, College Students, Selection, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Timmerman, Briana E. Crotwell; Strickland, Denise C.; Johnson, Robert L.; Payne, John R. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2011
We developed a rubric for measuring students' ability to reason and write scientifically. The Rubric for Science Writing (Rubric) was tested in a variety of undergraduate biology laboratory courses (total n = 142 laboratory reports) using science graduate students (teaching assistants) as raters. Generalisability analysis indicates that the Rubric…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Science Laboratories, Biology, Writing Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Adachi, Chie; Tai, Joanna Hong-Meng; Dawson, Phillip – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Despite compelling evidence of its potential effectiveness, uptake of self and peer assessment in higher education has been slower than expected. As with other assessment practices, self and peer assessment is ultimately enabled, or inhibited, by the actions of individual academics. This paper explores what academics see as the benefits and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Postmes, Lieselotte; Bouwmeester, Rianne; de Kleijn, Renske; van der Schaaf, Marieke – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Using rubrics can benefit the quality of assessment and learning. However, the conditions that stimulate or obstruct these benefits have been insufficiently studied. One underinvestigated claim is that rubrics are no substitution for good instruction and assessment and that teachers need training in utilising them. This is relevant since teachers…
Descriptors: Supervisors, Graduate Students, Scoring Rubrics, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Dorresteijn, Chevy; Kan, Kees-Jan; Smits, Niels – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
When higher education students are assessed multiple times, teachers need to consider how these assessments can be combined into a single pass or fail decision. A common question that arises is whether students should be allowed to take a resit. Previous research has found little to no clear learning benefits of resits and therefore suggested they…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Pretests Posttests, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mariana Orozco – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
When instructors assess students' laboratory reports to appraise the underlying scientific reasoning, they disclose their own concerns, epistemological assumptions and beliefs about science. The analysis of such assessments (i.e. rubric-centred scores and corresponding justificatory comments) offer a wealth of insights that can be re-engaged in…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Science Laboratories, Scoring Rubrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joughin, Gordon; Boud, David; Dawson, Phillip; Tai, Joanna – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
While there is now extensive research on informal feedback seeking behaviour by employees in organisations, this literature has received limited attention in higher education. This paper addresses the gap between the two fields of feedback literacy and feedback seeking behaviour. Key organisational feedback seeking behaviour concepts including…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Feedback (Response), Behavior, Employee Attitudes
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10