NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20240
Since 20230
Since 2020 (last 5 years)0
Since 2015 (last 10 years)0
Since 2005 (last 20 years)15
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 200116
Race to the Top2
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zumwalt, Karen – Teacher Education and Practice, 2011
In the early 1980s, process-product research to determine effective teaching practices was replacing efforts to "teacher-proof" the curriculum. Now 30 years later, although both these efforts did not lead to hoped-for changes, scientifically based research and data-driven instruction dominate the improvement discourse. Given the current…
Descriptors: Evidence, Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Research, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brint, Steven – Academe, 2008
Today, Americans face a challenge to the organization of higher education that, however it is resolved, will transform the enterprise. That challenge goes under the name "learning outcomes," or sometimes "accountability." It is a challenge brought largely by those outside higher education and is based on criticisms of the…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Higher Education, Standardized Tests, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ennis, Catherine D. – Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2014
The process of effective teaching--teaching that directly leads to student learning of standards-based content--is tenuous at best and easily disrupted by contextual and behavioral factors. In this commentary, I discuss the role of student support and mediation in teacher effectiveness and curricular reform. The most vocal students in physical…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Student Role, Physical Education Teachers, Student Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ravitch, Diane; Chubb, John E. – Education Next, 2009
More than seven years ago, President George W. Bush signed No Child Left Behind (NCLB) into law. Sweeping calls for testing, intervening in persistently low-performing schools, and policing teacher quality made it the most ambitious legislation on K-12 schooling in American history. The law, due for congressional reauthorization in 2007, still…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, School Choice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crow, Tracy – Journal of Staff Development, 2008
This article presents an interview with Richard F. Elmore on the need for educators to develop a collective practice. Elmore is the Gregory R. Anrig professor of educational leadership at the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University. He is also the co-director of the Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE). His research…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Educational Change, Instructional Leadership, Superintendents
Miller, Edward; Almon, Joan – Alliance for Childhood (NJ3a), 2009
Kindergarten has changed significantly in the last two decades: children now spend more time being taught and tested on literacy and math skills than they do learning through play and exploration, exercising their bodies, and using their imaginations. Many kindergartens use highly prescriptive curricula geared to new state standards and linked to…
Descriptors: Play, Early Childhood Education, State Standards, Standardized Tests
Lewis, Anne C. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2005
NCLB's emphasis on seeing to it that all classrooms are staffed by highly qualified teachers is commendable. Teacher competence is the most important factor in student learning. The ability to define that competence had been gradually emerging from research and policy making before NCLB, but the law, unfortunately, is loosening its grasp on a…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Public Education, Teaching (Occupation), Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Imig, David G.; Imig, Scott R. – Journal of Teacher Education, 2006
The locus of control in teacher education has been outside the hands of those who educate our nation's teachers for more than a century. Essentialists have long controlled the agenda for public schooling in America, and it is evident as well that their influence has prevailed in both the form and function of teacher education. The authors suggest…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Politics of Education, Teacher Education, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ingersoll, Richard M. – Sociology of Education, 2005
Few educational problems have received more attention than has the failure to ensure that the nation's classrooms are staffed by qualified teachers. Many states have pushed for more-rigorous preservice teacher education, training, and certification standards. Moreover, a host of recruitment initiatives have attempted to increase the supply of…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Teacher Effectiveness, Employment Level, Elementary Secondary Education
Hess, Frederick M.; Rotherham, Andrew J.; Walsh, Kate – WestEd, 2005
In recent years, the debate over teacher quality and preparation has gained new urgency. Competing groups of partisans have dominated this debate: one seemingly eager to assail the nation's education schools and to suggest that there is an insufficiently defined body of professional teaching knowledge, the other committed to advancing…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Education, Teacher Education Programs, Teacher Qualifications
Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education, 2004
The rigorous assessment and accountability provisions in the landmark No Child Left Behind Act are challenging educators to explore new ways to improve instruction in the nation's schools. One powerful tool in this transformation is technology. To generate and share ideas on how technology can assist educators, two technology summits are convened…
Descriptors: Expertise, Electronic Learning, Federal Legislation, Information Technology
Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning, 2006
The federal "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLB), the 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, seeks to improve student learning by setting high standards for academic achievement and putting into place basic school and district requirements to frame the improvement effort. Among those requirements considered to…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Beginning Teachers, Teacher Qualifications, Elementary Secondary Education
Jakes, David – Technology & Learning, 2006
A report recently released by the Center on Education Policy reveals that the four-year-old No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act has indeed served to shine a light on the importance of professional development for K-12 educators. Beyond that basic fact, though, any real broad-based impact on the training of educators remains inconclusive. While the…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Professional Development, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Garcia, Veronica – Harvard Educational Review, 2006
In this article, four urban high school students and their student leadership and social justice class advisor address the question, "What are high school students' perspectives on the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act's (NCLB) definition of a highly qualified teacher?" As the advisor to the course, Garcia challenged her students to examine…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, High School Students, High Schools, Personal Narratives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunter, Jill – Childhood Education, 2005
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which is regarded as the most significant federal education policy initiative in a generation, was signed into law on January 8, 2002. The purpose of this law is to ensure that each child in America is able to meet the high learning standards set forth by the state in which he or she lives. One of the specific…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Policy, Preservice Teachers
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2