NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20240
Since 20230
Since 2020 (last 5 years)0
Since 2015 (last 10 years)0
Since 2005 (last 20 years)6
Source
Psychology in the Schools36
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 36 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dale, Brittany A.; Finch, Maria HernÁndez; Mcintosh, David E.; Rothlisberg, Barbara A.; Finch, W. Holmes – Psychology in the Schools, 2014
Current research on the use of revisions of intelligence measures with ethnically diverse populations and younger children is limited. The present study investigated the utility of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5), with an ethnically diverse preschool sample. African American and Caucasian preschoolers, matched on age,…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Intelligence Tests, Scores, African American Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chang, Mei; Paulson, Sharon E.; Finch, W. Holmes; Mcintosh, David E.; Rothlisberg, Barbara A. – Psychology in the Schools, 2014
This study examined the underlying constructs measured by the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Third Edition (WJ-III COG) and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5), based on the Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities. This study reports the results of the first joint confirmatory factor analysis…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Children, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ward, Kimberly E.; Rothlisberg, Barbara A.; McIntosh, David E.; Bradley, Madeline H. – Psychology in the Schools, 2011
The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB-V), based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of intelligence using a sample of 200 preschool children. The CHC framework uses three different models: one similar to Spearman's "g", one similar to the…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Intelligence Tests, Factor Structure, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keith, Timothy Z.; Reynolds, Matthew R. – Psychology in the Schools, 2010
This article reviews factor-analytic research on individually administered intelligence tests from a Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) perspective. Although most new and revised tests of intelligence are based, at least in part, on CHC theory, earlier versions generally were not. Our review suggests that whether or not they were based on CHC theory, the…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Cognitive Tests, Test Validity, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Williams, Tasha H.; McIntosh, David E.; Dixon, Felicia; Newton, Jocelyn H.; Youman, Elizabeth – Psychology in the Schools, 2010
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fifth Edition (SB5), is a recently published, multidimensional measure of intelligence based on Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory. The author of the test provides results from confirmatory factor analyses in the technical manual supporting the five-factor structure of the instrument. Other authors have…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, School Psychologists, Construct Validity, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Newton, Jocelyn H.; McIntosh, David E.; Dixon, Felicia; Williams, Tasha; Youman, Elizabeth – Psychology in the Schools, 2008
This study examined the accuracy of three shortened measures of intelligence: the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability, Third Edition Brief Intellectual Ability (WJ III COG BIA) score; the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fifth Edition Abbreviated IQ (SB5 ABIQ); and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test IQ Composite (K-BIT) in predicting…
Descriptors: Gifted, Children, Comparative Analysis, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simpson, Michael; Carone, Dominic A., Jr.; Burns, William J.; Seidman, Traci; Montgomery, Doil; Sellers, Alfred – Psychology in the Schools, 2002
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (SB-IV), were administered to 20 gifted children and 20 non-gifted children to examine the extent of the difference in IQ scores obtained on the two tests. Results show that the SB-IV Composite Score was significantly…
Descriptors: Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, School Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Salvia, John; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1975
Inspection of the 1972 revised norms for the Stanford-Binet demonstrate that the average mental age for a particular chronological age (CA) no longer numerically corresponds to that CA. Thus, mental ages derived from the test cannot any longer be interpreted as mental ages. A table of test ages based on the 1972 norms is provided. (Author)
Descriptors: Age, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoffman, Seymour; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1975
The Quick Test, Form I (QT) and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M (SB) were administered to 70 preschool children. Results raise serious doubt about the validity of the QT functioning. Further research is indicated. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ritter, David R.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1974
Seeks to determine convergent validity values and to compare intelligence estimates for three tests across various levels and ranges of intelligence. Results indicated that the use of the PPUT or DAP for determining intelligence of kindergarten children is unjustified. (Author/PC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levinson, Philip J.; Carpenter, Robert L. – Psychology in the Schools, 1975
Certain subtests of the WISC, ITPA, and Stanford-Binet are used as measures of analogical reasoning. Because several facts suggested that the form of analogy used on these subtests does not require subjects to engage in true analogical reasoning, the validity of these subtests as measures of analogical reasoning was investigated. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Intelligence Tests, Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stone, Mark – Psychology in the Schools, 1975
The S.I.T. is an age scale of intelligence with demonstrated reliability and high validity coefficients correlated to the Stanford-Binet. The items of the SIT were classified according to a scheme resembling Valett's classification of Stanford-Binet test items. A comparison of the classifications is made. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Evaluation, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gerken, Kathryn Clark; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1978
It was found that the General Cognitive Index scores of the McCarthy Scales correlated well with the Stanford-Binet IQ scores. However, 40 of the 44 subjects scored higher on the Stanford-Binet than on the McCarthy Scales. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stewart, Kenneth D.; Jones, Elvis C. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
Ten years of validity research concerning the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) is reviewed. The equivalence of the SIT to the Stanford-Binet and the Wechsler Scales is examined and the relationship of the SIT to achievement measures is described. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Robert J., Jr. – Psychology in the Schools, 1977
Comparison of Stanford-Binet IQ scores obtained with the 1972 and 1960 norms of 228 children indicated that use of the 1972 norms resulted in substantially lower scores except at the lowest levels for functioning. The implications of these results were discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Evaluation Methods, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3