Foucauldian research, as it is currently practised, is generally unwilling to offer a vision of alternative futures. This article examines the recent work (2007 and 2009) of Jan Masschelein and Maarten Simons which appears to be an exception. They offer a critique of contemporary trends in higher education and propose an alternative model: the "world university". However, as I argue, their scheme for a world university is of limited use in its current form precisely because it is an "anti"-utopian recommendation. This reflects a deep suspicion of utopian thought that is typical of Foucauldian research. After examining the reasons for Foucault's aversion to openly normative, futuristic thought, I suggest that the making of "anti"-utopian proposals can only lead a Foucauldian analysis into paradox. It seems that those who adopt a Foucauldian approach must either remain silent when it comes to the future, or they must adapt their use of Foucault to embrace a substantial utopian dimension. (Contains 1 note.)