Descriptor
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Due Process | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Legal Problems | 1 |
| Preservice Teacher Education | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Student Rights | 1 |
| Student Teacher Supervisors | 1 |
| Student Teachers | 1 |
Source
| Action in Teacher Education | 1 |
Author
| Helm, Virginia | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHelm, Virginia – Action in Teacher Education, 1982
Legal points are discussed which student teacher supervisors should bear in mind when writing negative student evaluations. To avoid charges of libel and to assure due process, supervisors should: (1) stick to factual and objective statements; (2) inform students of problems early; (3) avoid public statements about deficiencies; and (4) avoid…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Due Process, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
