NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 46 to 60 of 10,143 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Haubrick, John; Levy, Deena; Cruz, Laura – Online Learning, 2021
In this study we looked at how participation in a peer-review process for online Statistics courses utilizing a master course model at a major research university affects instructor innovation and instructor presence. We used online, anonymous surveys to collect data from instructors who participated in the peer-review process, and we used…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Peer Evaluation, Statistics Education, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olitsky, Stacy – Science Education, 2022
In this essay, I explore some of the insights provided in a set of three manuscripts that focus on centering equity in peer review, authored by Bancroft, Ryoo and Miles, Nkrumah and Mutegi, and Marshall and Salter. I consider various aspects of their arguments, highlighting implications for the procedures and norms of journals and funding…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Social Justice, Science Education, Merit Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kramer, Tereza Joy; Zeccardi, Joe; Emhoff, Chi-An W.; Williams, Claire; Dunn, Robin J.; Rose, Joshua – Across the Disciplines, 2022
This comparative, mixed-methods study illustrates the impact of weekly facilitated peer review ("Writing Circles") in STEM courses across time: 1) in a lower-division course, Circles improve all learning outcomes for writing and critical thinking, and most significantly, writing; 2) in an upper-division course, Circles are most effective…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, STEM Education, Power Structure, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wei-Yan Li; Kevin Kau; Yi-Jiun Shiung – SAGE Open, 2023
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) software has been viewed as a promising tool for assisting writing. This study integrated AWE and its combination with peer review discussion into writing practice in a large college writing class in the Asian context. Adopting a mixed-method approach, this study employed a quantitative questionnaire to…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Indriasari, Theresia Devi; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Denny, Paul – Education and Information Technologies, 2020
We present the first systematic review of the use of gamification in educational peer review activities. The goal of this work is to understand how gamification has been used to engage students in peer review activities and to summarize the empirical evidence for its effectiveness. Our main contribution is the presentation of a general model of…
Descriptors: Game Based Learning, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), STEM Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lindsay Vance; Joanne Caniglia; Michelle Meadows – International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2023
Despite the research regarding the importance of peer review and feedback in pre-service special education teachers, there exists a gap in teaching complex mathematical concepts such as fractional operations. This study sought to address this gap by investigating how pre-service teachers can effectively appraise and revise peer-generated teaching…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Special Education Teachers, Mathematics Instruction, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Manning, Shaun Justin; Jobbitt, Todd – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2019
This article introduces Peer Review Circles (PRC), a classroom task that fully engages learners in the peer review process. The authors had observed their undergraduate students were reluctant to do peer review and even more reluctant to use the comments received. To improve the peer review process, the authors decided to change it into a…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Learner Engagement, Undergraduate Students, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Babik, Dmytro; Stevens, Scott P.; Waters, Andrew; Tinapple, David – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2020
Over the last 20 years, online peer review and assessment have become widely used and well-researched practices in education. Their use increased, especially with the proliferation of nonconventional large-scale and online modes of teaching and learning, such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). A well-designed peer-review system is expected to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Fidelity, Networks, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kostopoulou, Stergiani; O'Dwyer, Fergus – Language Learning in Higher Education, 2021
This evidence-based, procedural paper outlines academic writing peer review practices conducted by Pre-Master's Pathway and pre-undergraduate Foundation programme students at two Irish universities. The theoretical framework section presents the view that formative teacher feedback on student writing alone is insufficient, suggesting sustainable…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Culver, K. C.; Bowman, Nicholas A.; Youngerman, Ethan; Jang, Nayoung; Just, Craig L. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2022
Although effective technical communication is an important outcome of undergraduate education in STEM fields, limited process-based writing instruction occurs in these disciplines. This study employed an experimental design to examine the use of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR), an online peer review platform, to improve lab report writing in an…
Descriptors: Equal Education, Academic Achievement, STEM Education, Content Area Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gemma Elizabeth Derrick; Alessandra Zimmermann; Helen Greaves; Jonathan Best; Richard Klavans – Research Evaluation, 2023
Previous studies of the use of peer review for the allocation of competitive funding agencies have concentrated on questions of efficiency and how to make the 'best' decision, by ensuring that successful applicants are also the more productive or visible in the long term. This paper examines the components of feedback received from an unsuccessful…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Researchers, Peer Evaluation, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Horbach, Serge P. J. M.; Halffman, Willem – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2020
Peer review of journal submissions has become one of the most important pillars of quality management in academic publishing. Because of growing concerns with the quality and effectiveness of the system, a host of enthusiastic innovators has proposed and experimented with new procedures and technologies. However, little is known about whether…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Peer Evaluation, Editing, Journal Articles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Do, Thi Bich Thuy – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2023
While several research studies have investigated the impact of peer review training (PRT) on writing quality of L2 students, effects of PRT on revision quantity and quality remain vague. The purpose of this study was to compare revision quantity and quality before and after a scaffolded PRT following Anderson's proceduralization theory. Twenty…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Grainger, Peter; Fleischman, David; Birch, Dawn – e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 2021
Assessment is a key driver for engagement and a widely criticised aspect of the tertiary student experience. In regard to assessment, in particular, feedback, rubrics and peer review have been major focuses for researchers in recent years. This research utilised an innovative peer review process in a triad structure to evaluate and improve…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Scoring Rubrics, Business Administration Education, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Chaktsiris, Mary G.; Southworth, James – Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2019
The benefits of a peer review process tend to be evaluated in terms of improvements to students' writing. But are there reasons why instructors might want to implement peer review into their courses over and above writing development? In this study, we collected data from 30 university students on their perceptions of a peer review process.…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Peer Evaluation, Student Writing Models, Student Attitudes
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  677