NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 44 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dunaway, Krystall; Gardner, Kristine; Grieve, Karly – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
As part of its "Guiding Principles for Evaluators," the American Evaluation Association (AEA) requires that evaluators develop cultural competencies. Using a successive-independent-samples design, the researchers sought to compare perceptions of cultural competence across a duration of 10 years. Qualitative data were collected via online…
Descriptors: Cultural Awareness, Program Evaluation, Evaluators, Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This essay explores the contributions of "Evaluation Practice" and the "American Journal of Evaluation" to our understanding of evaluation ethics. The review is organized according to the five Guiding Principles for Evaluators (Systematic Inquiry, Competence, Integrity/Honesty, Respect for People, and Responsibilities for General and Public…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Inquiry, Systems Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Russ-Eft, Darlene F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
This paper examines the issues involved in the use of ethical standards related to social responsibility using the two ethical codes: the American Evaluation Association "Guiding Principles for Evaluators" and the Academy of Human Resource Development "Standards on Ethics and Integrity." This examination will take the perspective of an internal…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Integrity, Social Responsibility, Ethics
Chyung, Seung Youn; Winiecki, Donald J.; Downing, Jessica L. – Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2010
Ethical concerns are rising in the business world. With this in mind, training and performance improvement practitioners, especially during evaluation projects, should be aware of principles and codes of ethics, and their behaviors and decisions should reflect the standards recognized by members of the professional society. A study was conducted…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Performance Technology, Case Method (Teaching Technique)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kallemeyn, Leanne M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
The purpose of an evaluation, its methodology and design, and the data that evaluators generate represent programs and stakeholders in particular ways. In the evaluation described in this article, the author faced making extensive methodological changes to an evaluation. In the process, she considered and reflected on the implications of these…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Research Methodology, Evaluation, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Regeer, Barbara J.; Hoes, Anne-Charlotte; van Amstel-van Saane, Mariette; Caron-Flinterman, Francisca F.; Bunders, Joske F. G. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
A new generation of public programs emerges, which specifically addresses complex societal problems we witness today. Programs for these types of complex issues--in this article, we consider more closely the challenge of sustainable development--are characterized by emergent design, learning processes between diverse actors, and adaptive…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Intervention, Program Evaluation, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shadish, William R., Ed.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1995
The 12 articles (including an index) of this theme issue are devoted to documenting and critiquing the American Evaluation Association's "Guiding Principles for Evaluators," a code of ethics and standards. The development of these principles is traced, and their strengths and weaknesses are analyzed at general and specific levels. (SLD)
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jewiss, Jennifer; Clark-Keefe, Kelly – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
The necessities and benefits of reflexivity are now well laid out in the broader social science literature, and the American Evaluation Association's (2004) "Guiding Principles for Evaluators" identify reflective practices that evaluators are expected to carry out. This article uses the context of the university classroom and a writing sample to…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Familiarity, Self Disclosure (Individuals), Reflective Teaching
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Datta, Lois-ellin – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Examines arguments for and against evaluation advocacy in terms of the American Evaluation Association's "Guiding Principles for Evaluators" and other statements on advocacy and neutrality. Suggests revision of the "Guiding Principles." (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Ethics, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Birman, Dina – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
The article addresses a hypothetical dilemma confronted by an evaluator of a transition from welfare program regarding inclusion of a small immigrant/language minority group in the study. The article advocates for inclusion of diverse groups. Three important aspects of diversity are discussed that have particular relevance to transition from…
Descriptors: Minority Groups, Integrity, Immigrants, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tucker, Susan; Stevahn, Laurie; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article compares the purposes and content of the four foundational documents of the American Evaluation Association (AEA): the Program Evaluation Standards, the AEA Public Statement on Cultural Competence in Evaluation, the AEA Evaluator Competencies, and the AEA Guiding Principles. This reflection on alignment is an early effort in the third…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Comparative Analysis, Professional Associations, Program Evaluation
Baron, Michelle Elyce – ProQuest LLC, 2009
Although many leaders in evaluation advise evaluators to address the diverse needs of stakeholders, very little is known about how or if practicing evaluators address this injunction. Understanding how practicing evaluators address the needs of multiple stakeholders could inform evaluator training. The purpose of this qualitative study was to…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Stakeholders, Qualitative Research, Conflict Resolution
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fitzpatrick, Jody L., Ed.; Morris, Michael, Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Examines ethical codes within evaluation and related disciplines and processions and discusses implications for content, dissemination, and compliance. An immediate issue is expanding the dialog that the American Evaluation Association document "Guiding Principles for Evaluators" was intended to create. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Ethics, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Sara Campbell – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Coach education programs (CEPs) provide coaches with the knowledge and skills necessary to improve athlete's sport experiences. However, CEPs have historically failed to position themselves as a valuable source of coach learning (Cushion et al., 2010), indicating there is a need to evaluate and improve CEPs. Given this, the purpose of this study…
Descriptors: Athletic Coaches, Teacher Education Programs, Program Evaluation, Program Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
Successfully providing guidance to others is no easy task. Such is the challenge faced by committees charged with developing guidelines for ethical professional practice. The process of establishing and revising the Program Evaluation Standards (Joint Committee, 1994), for example, is a multiyear task that must seems endless to participants: a…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Ethics, Standards
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3