To Have or Not To Have? A Preliminary Analysis of Higher Education Funding Disparities in the Post-Ayers v Fordice Era: Evidence form Critical Race Theory.

Brady, Kevin; Eatman, Timothy; Parker, Laurence

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ604810

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 2000

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-0098-9495

EISSN: N/A

To Have or Not To Have? A Preliminary Analysis of Higher Education Funding Disparities in the Post-Ayers v Fordice Era: Evidence form Critical Race Theory.

Brady, Kevin; Eatman, Timothy; Parker, Laurence

Journal of Education Finance, v25 n3 p297-322 Win 2000

Reviews higher education racial desegregation equity since the U.S. Supreme Court's 1992 "Fordice" decision. Discusses historically black colleges and universities' future status and African-American students' progress, using finance data analyzed and interpreted via critical race theory. HBCU's receive inferior state appropriation levels, compared to traditionally white institutions. (Contains 81 resources.) (MLH)

Descriptors: Black Colleges, Black Students, Desegregation Effects, Educational Equity (Finance), Enrollment Trends, Higher Education, Institutional Survival, Public Policy, Racial Segregation, State Aid, Student Needs

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: United States v Fordice

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Privacy | Copyright | Contact Us | Selection Policy | API