Descriptor
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| Intelligence Quotient | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
| Standardized Tests | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
| Testing Problems | 1 |
Source
| Roeper Review | 1 |
Author
| Kearney, Katheryn | 1 |
| Silverman, Linda Kreger | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSilverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
