NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pearson, P. David; Hiebert, Elfrieda H.; Kamil, Michael L. – Reading Research Quarterly, 2007
The authors assert that, in order to teach vocabulary more effectively and better understand its relation to comprehension, we need first to address how vocabulary knowledge and growth are assessed. They argue that "vocabularly assessment is grossly undernourished, both in its theoretical and practical aspects--that it has been driven by…
Descriptors: Vocabulary Development, Lexicology, Instructional Effectiveness, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pearson, P. David; Kamil, Michael L. – Visible Language, 1974
Descriptors: College Students, Form Classes (Languages), Language Research, Morphemes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kamil, Michael L.; Pearson, P. David – Reading Research Quarterly, 1977
Continues discussion of Ronald Carter's Rauding Theory. (AA)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Models, Reading Comprehension, Reading Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pearson, P. David; Kamil, Michael L. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1977
Critiques Carver's presentation of his theory of reading comprehension and rauding (see article in same issue), interpreting the theory as a limited, serial, mathematical "model." (JM)
Descriptors: Learning Theories, Reading, Reading Comprehension, Reading Research
Kamil, Michael L.; Pearson, P. David – New York University Education Quarterly, 1979
In the bottom-up model of the reading process, the reader's first task is to decode the symbols into sound representations. By contrast, the top-down model assumes that the reader begins by guessing about the meaning of some unit of print. Each model suggests different instructional practices. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Educational Theories