The range of answers to the question, "What is Science?" has literally reached beyond the capability of any one person to adequately understand and summarize. This paper discusses the concept of the so-called "value-free" science, and contrasts this traditional mode of inquiry with the new modes of thought espoused by advocates of feminism and poststructuralism. It is concluded that the current conflict and disagreement over the nature of science is a positive situation and one which brings together many differing perspectives to the benefit of research. (PR)