In reaction to the passage of the Rodda Bill (SB 696, 1971 legislative session), this study concentrates on the instruments and procedures proposed for use in evaluating faculty at Glendale College (California). The two proposals analyzed are administrative viewpoint and faculty opinion. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) to measure the implementation of SB 696 against the purpose of the bill and the guidelines developed by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges; (2) to attempt to compare administrative and faculty opinions regarding evaluation; and (3) to compare both proposals against the suggested evaluation system of educational theorists. The goals of SB 696 depend on several factors: (1) whether the legislature will give the academic community enough time to experiment and devise sound techniques; (2) whether the local boards are willing to make financial investments on the implementation of SB 696; and (3) whether the teachers themselves view this process as a useful one for the improvement of instruction. (RG)