NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Journal of Agricultural…37
Publication Type
Journal Articles37
Reports - Research37
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Fair Labor Standards Act1
Assessments and Surveys
Learning Style Inventory1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 31 to 37 of 37 results Save | Export
Burris, Scott; Garton, Bryan L. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 2007
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) on critical thinking ability and content knowledge among selected secondary agriculture students in Missouri. The study employed a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent comparison group design. The treatment consisted of two instructional strategies: problem-based…
Descriptors: Educational Strategies, Agricultural Education, Problem Based Learning, Critical Thinking
Alston, Antoine J.; English, Chastity Warren – Journal of Agricultural Education, 2007
The purpose of this descriptive research study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Web-enhanced agricultural education pedagogy as perceived by students in a collegiate agricultural education program. Overall, respondents agreed there were many benefits to Web-enhanced courses and perceived all Web site components under study to be very useful.…
Descriptors: Agricultural Education, Technological Literacy, Educational Technology, Technology Integration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Joerger, Richard M. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 2003
A survey of farmers in the Minnesota Farm Business Management Education program (n=569) indicated the following: most continued enrollment beyond the 6-year diploma program; average net income increased $5,000; individualized instruction was the most popular and effective method; and farm recordkeeping was the most needed topic and most improved…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Agricultural Education, Delivery Systems, Farm Management
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rothenberger, Barbara Heins; Stewart, Bob R. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 1995
Of 168 high school students, 107 were taught a horticulture unit that included a greenhouse laboratory experience, 61 received the unit without the lab. Lab experience resulted in significantly higher knowledge scores but made no significant difference in postexperiment attitudes. (SK)
Descriptors: Greenhouses, High Schools, Horticulture, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Greg; Honeyman, Mark – Journal of Agricultural Education, 1994
According to responses from 61 of 78 enrollees in off-campus videotaped agriculture courses, most watched tapes without interruption and almost half viewed the tapes more than once. More positive attitudes emerged when instructors were perceived as facilitators rather than information providers and when it appeared that instructors used effective…
Descriptors: Agricultural Education, Extension Education, External Degree Programs, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Day, Tina M.; Raven, Matt R.; Newman, Michael E. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 1998
Traditional instruction in technical writing was given to 29 students and 29 were instructed via the World Wide Web. Examination scores and Group Embedded Figures Test results showed the Web class had significantly higher achievement and attitudes toward writing. No correlation was found between learning style and achievement or attitudes. (SK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Agricultural Education, Cognitive Style, Distance Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dyer, James E.; Osborne, Edward W. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 1999
High school agriculture students were taught using either a problem-solving (n=60) or subject-matter (n=52) approach. There were no differences in short- or long-term retention using either method across different learning styles. A moderate correlation was found between field independence and higher normal curve equivalent scores. (SK)
Descriptors: Agricultural Education, Cognitive Style, Field Dependence Independence, High Schools
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3