Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Elementary Schools | 2 |
| Fidelity | 2 |
| Positive Behavior Supports | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Archives | 1 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Check Lists | 1 |
| Coaching (Performance) | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Technical Assistance Center… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMeng, Paul M.; McIntosh, Kent; Claassen, Jennette; Hoselton, Robert – Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2016
School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) is an example of a framework for implementing school-based practices with fidelity and durability. Critical features of SWPBIS include: (a) teaming; (b) data-based decision making; and (c) using systems for supporting staff in implementation. These features of SWPBIS allow…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Program Implementation, Teamwork
Kim, Jerin; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Rob – Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2014
To illustrate the three-tiered model, Tier I (universal) supports are delivered similarly to all students in all settings, and at least 80% of students are expected to respond to these supports. Beyond universal supports, Tier II (targeted) supports serve 10-15% of students whose behavior does not respond to Tier I supports. A small group of…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Program Implementation, Student Behavior, Behavior Problems
