Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Familiarity | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Performance Based Assessment | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Teaching of Psychology | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMalouff, John M.; Emmerton, Ashley J.; Schutte, Nicola S. – Teaching of Psychology, 2013
Experts have advocated anonymous grading as a means of eliminating actual or perceived evaluator bias in subjective student assessment. The utility of anonymity in assessment rests on whether information derived from student identity can unduly influence evaluation. The halo effect provides a conceptual background for why a bias might occur. In…
Descriptors: Grading, Psychology, College Faculty, Teaching Assistants
