NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldhusen, John F.; And Others – Roeper Review, 1986
Grade advancement is a legitimate and valuable method of meeting the needs of some academically gifted students and is available to every school system. Twelve practical guidelines (such as comprehensive psychological evaluation prior to placement and arranging all cases of grade advancement initially on a trial basis) are offered. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Acceleration (Education), Age Grade Placement, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Starko, Alane J. – Roeper Review, 1986
The process of curriculum compacting, a means of modifying and enriching the regular curriculum to meet the needs of gifted students is described and illustrated with classroom examples. The roles of classroom teachers, administrators, and gifted education specialists in implementing compacting are explored. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Classroom Techniques, Curriculum Development, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Idol-Maestas, Lorna; Celentano, Ray – Roeper Review, 1986
The article describes the role of teacher consultants in working with classroom teachers, school counselors, and parents at one high school for academically gifted students. Two examples of how a teacher consultant effectively altered the performance of two students with organizational and study skill problems are offered. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Behavior Change, Consultants, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schack, Gina D. – Roeper Review, 1988
Teaching students the methodologies used by practicing professionals can increase creative productivity, levels of understanding, and motivation levels of bright students. How-to books can be used to explain these methodologies, by serving a mentor-in-print role, introducing students to new topics and processes, or providing a supplement to the…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Creative Thinking, Enrichment Activities, Independent Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolfle, Jane A. – Roeper Review, 1988
The third-grade classroom teacher can identify mathematically gifted students and can provide them with opportunities for extending their understanding and enjoyment of mathematics through use of such techniques as content sophistication, enrichment, peer tutoring, curriculum compacting, puzzles, and math centers. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Advanced Courses, Arithmetic
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
White, C. Stephen – Roeper Review, 1985
Assessment procedures aimed at differentiating intellectually gifted young children from their nongifted peers are proposed as alternatives to traditional identification procedures. Suggested is measuring the use of strategic behavior to solve novel problems. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Evaluation Methods, Problem Solving, Talent Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chang, Lisa L. – Roeper Review, 1985
The article, while focusing on mathematics and problem-solving characteristics, reexamines the definition of "mathematically gifted," and discusses current practices and some areas of concern related to the identification of the mathematically gifted. It also calls for an identification procedure which includes information about qualities of the…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Mathematics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGonagill, Barbara – Roeper Review, 1997
Introduces principles of Total Quality Management (TQM) and proposes incorporation of TQM within long-range planning efforts of gifted education programs. Principles such as involving all stakeholders, working for the long-term, and working systematically are applied in two sample charts organized around the goals of improving gifted…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Elementary Secondary Education, Long Range Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldhusen, John F.; Proctor, Theron B.; Black, Kathryn N. – Roeper Review, 2002
This reprint of an article on using grade advancement as a method for meeting the needs of some intellectually or academically gifted students is preceded by a commentary that concludes that popular sentiment and negative folklore supporting grade advancement are unfounded. Grade advancement guidelines are provided. (Contains references.) (CR)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academically Gifted, Acceleration (Education), Decision Making