NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1061734
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2015
Pages: 15
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0263-5143
EISSN: N/A
The Conceptions of Learning Science for Science-Mathematics Groups and Literature-Mathematics Groups in Turkey
Sadi, Ozlem; Lee, Min-Hsien
Research in Science & Technological Education, v33 n2 p182-196 2015
Background: The conceptions of learning have a deep effect on the learning process, and accordingly on learning outcomes. Some researchers emphasize that conceptions of learning are domain-dependent and there should be more research in different domains (e.g. science, literature) to enhance students' understanding of conceptions of learning science. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to examine and compare science-major and literature-major students' conceptions of learning science (COLS). Also, gender differences in COLS were examined for two majors. Sample: The sample for this study comprised of 503 high school students in 10th, 11th, and 12th grades (244 females, 259 males) in a district of Karaman in Turkey. Design and methods: The questionnaire, the Conceptions of Learning Science (COLS), developed by Lee, Johanson, and Tsai, was used to identify students' COLS. The data obtained via the questionnaire were analyzed by means of SPSS 15.0 statistical software. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the questionnaire. Then, two-way MANOVA was conducted to compare the mean scores regarding the students' majors and genders in terms of the factors of COLS. Results: The results of the study revealed that students in Science-Mathematics field tended to express more agreement with lower-level COLS, such as learning science by "memorizing," "preparing for exams," and "increasing one's knowledge" than those in Literature-Mathematics field. Second, more female students conceptualized learning science as "increasing one's knowledge," "applying," "understanding," or "seeing in a new way" than male students in both majors. Third, the findings of two-way MANOVA, in general, revealed that there were significant differences in the average scores of conceptions of "memorizing," "calculating and practicing," and "increasing one's knowledge" between two majors. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant mean difference between male and female students with respect to "memorizing," "preparing for exams," "calculating and practicing," "applying," "understanding," and "seeing in a new way." However, no interaction between students' majors and genders was found, indicating that the effect of students' major does not depend on gender with respect to all seven categories of COLS.
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools; Secondary Education; Grade 10; Grade 11; Grade 12
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Turkey
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A