NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Machácek, Vít – Research Evaluation, 2023
This study measures the tendency to publish in international scientific journals. For each of nearly 35,000 Scopus-indexed journals, we derive seven globalization indicators based on the composition of authors by country of origin and other characteristics. These are subsequently scaled up to the level of 174 countries and 27 disciplines between…
Descriptors: Authors, Periodicals, Global Approach, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Krzeski, Jakub; Szadkowski, Krystian; Kulczycki, Emanuel – Research Evaluation, 2022
The study investigates the process of creating evaluative homogeneity within a performance-based research funding system. It does so in reference to the experience of creating a national journal ranking in Poland in 2019. It refers to the cases of two disciplines: biology and history. The use of this case is justified by its unique character, that…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Reputation, Financial Support, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oviedo-García, M. Ángeles – Research Evaluation, 2021
The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases. Journal Citation Reports (JCRs), a reference for the assessment of researchers and for…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Integrity, Credibility, Databases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolfram, Dietmar; Wang, Peiling; Abuzahra, Fuad – Research Evaluation, 2021
Journals that adopt open peer review (OPR), where review reports of published articles are publicly available, provide an opportunity to study both review content characteristics and quantitative aspects of the overall review process. This study investigates two areas relevant to the quality assessment of manuscript reviews. First, do journal…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Horbach, Serge P. J. M. – Research Evaluation, 2021
The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a considerable impact on the scientific enterprise, including scholarly publication and peer-review practices. Several studies have assessed these impacts, showing among others that medical journals have strongly accelerated their review processes for COVID-19-related content. This has raised questions and…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Medicine, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bautista-Puig, Núria; Moreno Lorente, Luis; Sanz-Casado, Elías – Research Evaluation, 2021
The effects of economic incentives on research have been widely debated in the literature. Some authors deem them to have no or even an adverse impact, particularly, if they are perceived as irrelevant to or an attempt to control researcher activity, whilst others believe they enhance research productivity by inducing new habits such as…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Educational Policy, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mertkan, Sefika; Onurkan Aliusta, Gulen; Suphi, Nilgun – Research Evaluation, 2021
Intensified pressure to publish is a hallmark of a rapidly evolving higher education field where the faculty of any hue cannot avoid the 'publish or perish' treadmill. Growing need to publish more and to do so fast have resulted in the proliferation of pseudo scholarly publications many regards as 'predatory'. This article provides a systematic…
Descriptors: Authors, Writing for Publication, Periodicals, Deception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Álvarez-Bornstein, Belén; Montesi, Michela – Research Evaluation, 2020
The topic of acknowledgements has produced abundant research since the 1970s, though, as previous studies point out, the value of acknowledgements has not yet been demonstrated and further research is limited by lack of conceptualization. This study focuses on funding acknowledgements (FAs), considering that funding represents an important input…
Descriptors: Financial Support, Citations (References), Periodicals, Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dorta-González, Pablo; Santana-Jiménez, Yolanda – Research Evaluation, 2018
The potential benefit of open access (OA) in relation to citation impact has been discussed in the literature in depth. The methodology used to test the OA citation advantage includes comparing OA vs. non-OA journal impact factors and citations of OA vs. non-OA articles published in the same non-OA journals. However, one problem with many studies…
Descriptors: Databases, Access to Information, Incidence, Citations (References)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewandowska, Kamila; Stano, Pawel Miroslaw – Research Evaluation, 2018
Art studies, as an academic discipline, is an under-researched topic, especially with reference to science evaluation. Yet, it is a particularly interesting field to study given that it does not easily fit into the 'science' category. Our analysis centres on the core element of the evaluation system: scientific journals in the field of arts. We…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Foreign Countries, Art Education, Art
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chavarro, Diego; Ràfols, Ismael; Tang, Puay – Research Evaluation, 2018
The assessment of research based on the journal in which it is published is a widely adopted practice. Some research assessments use the Web of Science (WoS) to identify 'high quality' journals, which are assumed to publish excellent research. The authority of WoS on journal quality stems from its selection of journals based on editorial standards…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Bibliographic Databases, Foreign Countries, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petersen, Jessica – Research Evaluation, 2017
Journal editors play a crucial role in the scientific publication system, as they make the final decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts. Some critics, however, suspect that the more innovative a manuscript is, the less likely it will be accepted for publication. Especially top-tier journals are accused of rejecting innovative research.…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Editing, Intellectual Disciplines, Online Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ahmed, Mohamed O.; Daw, Mohamed A.; van Velkinburgh, Jennifer C. – Research Evaluation, 2017
Understanding the publication output of a country's biomedical research can provide information for strengthening its policies, economy, and educational systems. Yet, this is the first bibliometric study to date to analyze and provide an in-depth discussion of the biomedical research productivity from Libyan academic institutions. The biomedical…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Periodicals, Biomedicine, Foreign Countries