NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kampfmann, Teresa; Bernert, Philip; Lang, Daniel J. – Research Evaluation, 2023
The number of real-world laboratories (RwLs) as research settings to address sustainability problems by using collaborative and experimental approaches has been growing steadily over the past years. RwLs are widely considered promising settings for the production of action-orientated knowledge in order to contribute solving wicked real-world…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Cooperation, Research, Laboratories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Higgins, Linden E.; Smith, Julia M. – Research Evaluation, 2022
In 2015, a multidisciplinary group of academic researchers and extension personnel was awarded a US Department of Agriculture Coordinated Agricultural Project grant. The team's goal was to understand human decision-making in the context of potential livestock disease outbreaks, investigating the impediments to increased adoption of biosecurity…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Cooperation, Extension Agents, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Sandes-Guimaraes, Luisa Veras; Velho, Raquel; Plonski, Guilherme Ary – Research Evaluation, 2022
Research impact on various societal spheres has been increasingly demanded for funding purposes and as a form of demonstrating the relevance of scientific research for societal problems. In this context, interest in interdisciplinary research and knowledge coproduction has grown as a path to achieve this expected impact, but few studies have…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Educational Research, Public Policy, Cooperation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bone, Frédérique; Hopkins, Michael M.; Ràfols, Ismael; Molas-Gallart, Jordi; Tang, Puay; Davey, Gail; Carr, Antony M. – Research Evaluation, 2020
Growth in collaborative research raises difficulties for those tasked with research evaluation, particularly in situations where outcomes are slow to emerge. This article presents the 'Diversity Approach to Research Evaluation' (DARE) as a novel way to assess how researchers engaged in knowledge creation and application work together as teams.…
Descriptors: Diversity, Research Projects, Cooperation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Giachi, Sandro; Fernández-Esquinas, Manuel – Research Evaluation, 2020
This article analyses the diversification of research systems by focusing on the role of the new population of centres created by universities, public research organizations, and firms for the purpose of knowledge transfer and exchange. It departs from the mix of policies and the structural conditions in Spain which resulted in an organizational…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research and Development Centers, Universities, Public Sector
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Álvarez-Bornstein, Belén; Montesi, Michela – Research Evaluation, 2020
The topic of acknowledgements has produced abundant research since the 1970s, though, as previous studies point out, the value of acknowledgements has not yet been demonstrated and further research is limited by lack of conceptualization. This study focuses on funding acknowledgements (FAs), considering that funding represents an important input…
Descriptors: Financial Support, Citations (References), Periodicals, Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gibson, Chris; Stutchbury, Tamantha; Ikutegbe, Victoria; Michielin, Nicole – Research Evaluation, 2019
Challenge-led interdisciplinary research is a relatively new way of bringing together disciplinary expertise in response to complex societal and environmental problems. Common difficulties include how to define 'interdisciplinary research'; how to improve the participation and flourishing of early-career researchers; and how to manage projects…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Research, Cooperation, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Budd, Julia M. – Research Evaluation, 2018
Evaluating cross-disciplinary collaboration has generally been undertaken using disciplinary standards. However, this practice is increasingly being found to be inadequate due to the often contradictory nature of the methods used. It has been suggested that methods that consider the unique integrative nature of these studies be employed. This…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Interdisciplinary Approach, Cooperation, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hansen, Thomas Trøst; Budtz Pedersen, David – Research Evaluation, 2018
Demands on publicly funded scientific research to yield academic and societal impact have been commonplace for some time. Research communities, university administrators, and policy-makers are looking to impact assessments and impact tool kits to better communicate the value of scholarly work, increase collaboration with nonacademic partners, and…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Cooperation, Guidelines, Science and Society
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reale, Emanuela; Zinilli, Antonio – Research Evaluation, 2017
Evaluation for the allocation of project-funding schemes devoted to sustain academic research often undergoes changes of the rules for the ex-ante selection, which are supposed to improve the capability of peer review to select the best proposals. How modifications of the rules realize a more accountable evaluation result? Do the changes suggest…
Descriptors: Resource Allocation, Peer Evaluation, Financial Support, Research Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ginexi, Elizabeth M.; Huang, Grace; Steketee, Michael; Tsakraklides, Sophia; MacAllum, Keith; Bromberg, Julie; Huffman, Amanda; Luke, Douglas A.; Leischow, Scott J.; Okamoto, Janet M.; Rogers, Todd – Research Evaluation, 2017
This article presents a case study of a scientist-practitioner research network established by the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative. While prior programs have focused on collaboration among scientists, a goal here was to encourage collaborations with non-university, practice-based partners. Two…
Descriptors: Social Networks, Network Analysis, Scientists, Case Studies