NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 202414
Since 202344
Since 2020 (last 5 years)117
Since 2015 (last 10 years)212
Audience
Researchers4
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Health Insurance Portability…1
Assessments and Surveys
Positive and Negative Affect…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 212 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kimberley Serpico – Research Ethics, 2024
The quality of a research study application sends a distinct signal to the institutional review board (IRB) about the skills, capacities, preparation, communication, experience, and resources of its authors. However, efforts to research and define IRB application quality have been insufficient. Inattention to the quality of an IRB application is…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Institutional Evaluation, Governing Boards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Amanda B. Lees; Rosemary Godbold; Simon Walters – Research Ethics, 2024
While the need to protect vulnerable research participants is universal, conceptual challenges with the notion of vulnerability may result in the under or over-protection of participants. Ethics review bodies making assumptions about who is vulnerable and in what circumstance can be viewed as paternalistic if they do not consider participant…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Scholarship, Instruction, Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiwonge K. Mtande; Carl Lombard; Gonasagrie Nair; Stuart Rennie – Research Ethics, 2024
Although the use of the cluster randomized trial (CRT) design to evaluate vaccines, public health interventions or health systems is increasing, the ethical issues posed by the design are not adequately addressed, especially in low- and middle-income country settings (LMICs). To help reveal ethical challenges, qualitative interviews were conducted…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Ethics, Randomized Controlled Trials, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gwen Lemey; Trésor Zola; Ynke Larivière; Solange Milolo; Engbu Danoff; Lazarre Bakonga; Emmanuel Esanga; Peter Vermeiren; Vivi Maketa; Junior Matangila; Patrick Mitashi; Pierre Van Damme; Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden; Raffaella Ravinetto; Hypolite Muhindo-Mavoko – Research Ethics, 2024
In this paper, we discuss challenges associated with implementing a policy for Ancillary Care (AC) for related and unrelated (serious) adverse events during an Ebola vaccine trial conducted in a remote area of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Conducting clinical trials in resource-constrained settings can raise context-related challenges that…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Immunization Programs, Communicable Diseases, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mathilde Léon; Shoba S. Meera; Anne-Caroline Fiévet; Alejandrina Cristia – Research Ethics, 2024
The last decade has seen a rise in big data approaches, including in the humanities, whereby large quantities of data are collected and analysed. In this paper, we discuss long-form audio recordings that result from individuals wearing a recording device for many hours. Linguists, psychologists and anthropologists can use them, for example, to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Developing Nations, Data Collection, Audio Equipment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zeinab Mohammed; Fatma Abdelgawad; Mamoun Ahram; Maha E. Ibrahim; Alya Elgamri; Ehsan Gamel; Latifa Adarmouch; Karima El Rhazi; Samar Abd ElHafeez; Henry Silverman – Research Ethics, 2024
Members of research ethics committees (RECs) face a number of ethical challenges when reviewing genomic research. These include issues regarding the content and type of consent, the return of individual research results, mechanisms of sharing specimens and health data, and appropriate community engagement efforts. This article presents the…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Committees, Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hugo Boothby – Research Ethics, 2024
In 2019, a new national Ethics Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten, EPM) was created in Sweden. In 2020, Sweden's "Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans Act" was revised, tightening this legislation, and increasing penalties for its infraction. This article draws on empirical material generated by artistic research conducted…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Musicians, Disabilities, Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Laura Cooper; Kylie Johnston; Marie Williams – Research Ethics, 2024
Many countries, including Australia, have established a national scheme that supports the recognition of a single ethical review for multi-centre research conducted in publicly funded health services. However, local site-specific governance review processes remain decentralised and highly variable. This short report describes the ethics and…
Descriptors: National Surveys, Health Services, Risk, Governance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dickson Okoree Mireku; Prosper Dzifa Dzamesi; Brandford Bervell – Research Ethics, 2024
The purpose of this study was to map the distribution of publications on plagiarism among higher educational institutions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Studies reviewed were based on 171 plagiarism related publications within a decade (2012-2022). Findings revealed that most plagiarism related articles were published in 2016. Additionally, a…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Plagiarism, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alya Elgamri; Zeinab Mohammed; Karima El-Rhazi; Manal Shahrouri; Mamoun Ahram; Al-Mubarak Al-Abbas; Henry Silverman – Research Ethics, 2024
Arab researchers encounter formidable obstacles when conducting and publishing their scientific work. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 Arab researchers from various Arab Middle East countries to gain a comprehensive understanding of the difficulties they face in research and publication. We analyzed the transcripts using reflexive…
Descriptors: Authors, Arabs, Writing for Publication, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sylvia Nabukenya; David Kyaddondo; Adelline Twimukye; Ian Guyton Munabi; Catriona Waitt; Erisa S Mwaka – Research Ethics, 2024
This study aimed to explore stakeholders' perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV. A qualitative approach to investigation involved five focus group discussions with 30 Community representatives, 12 key informant interviews with researchers, and 12 in-depth…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), Pharmacology, Genetics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anaïs Resseguier; Fabienne Ufert – Research Ethics, 2024
As the artificial intelligence (AI) ethics field is currently working towards its operationalisation, ethics review as carried out by research ethics committees (RECs) constitutes a powerful, but so far underdeveloped, framework to make AI ethics effective in practice at the research level. This article contributes to the elaboration of research…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Artificial Intelligence, Federal Legislation, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sapfo Lignou; Mark Sheehan; Ilina Singh – Research Ethics, 2024
Many research institutions and funders have recently stated their commitment to actively support and promote 'Equality, Diversity and Inclusion' (EDI) in various aspects of health research including Patient and Public Involvement (PPI). However, translating this commitment into specific research projects presents significant challenges that…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Medical Research, Patients, Inclusion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vasiliki Mollaki – Research Ethics, 2024
Peer review facilitates quality control and integrity of scientific research. Although publishing policies have adapted to include the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in the preparation of manuscripts by authors, there is a lack of guidelines or policies on whether peer…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing for Publication, Ethics, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brown, Nicole – Research Ethics, 2023
The role of research ethics committees, and research ethics issues more broadly are often not viewed in the context of the development of scientific methods and the academic community. This topic piece seeks to redress this gap. I begin with a brief outline of the changes we experience within the social sciences before exploring in more detail…
Descriptors: Social Science Research, Research Methodology, Ethics, Research Committees
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  15