Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Ethics | 2 |
| Research Problems | 2 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Authors | 1 |
| Biomedicine | 1 |
| Criminal Law | 1 |
| Deception | 1 |
| Doctoral Students | 1 |
| Experience | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Integrity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Ethics | 2 |
Author
| Holm, Søren | 2 |
| Bouter, Lex M. | 1 |
| Cuijpers, Pim | 1 |
| Dal-Ré, Rafael | 1 |
| Gluud, Christian | 1 |
| Hofmann, Bjørn | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Norway (Oslo) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDal-Ré, Rafael; Bouter, Lex M.; Cuijpers, Pim; Gluud, Christian; Holm, Søren – Research Ethics, 2020
For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)--although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations. A critical issue in deciding whether research misconduct should be subject to criminal law is its definition, because not all…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Deception, Ethics, Criminal Law
Hofmann, Bjørn; Holm, Søren – Research Ethics, 2019
Background: Research integrity has gained attention in the general public as well as in the research community. We wanted to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices amongst researchers that have recently finished their PhD and compare this to their responses during their PhD fellowship. In particular, we wanted to investigate whether their…
Descriptors: Integrity, Foreign Countries, Researchers, Doctoral Students
