Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Communications | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Program Validation | 1 |
| Standard Setting | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research & Practice in… | 1 |
Author
| DeMars, Christine E. | 1 |
| Horst, S. Jeanne | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textHorst, S. Jeanne; DeMars, Christine E. – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2016
The Mapmark standard setting method was adapted to a higher education setting in which faculty leaders were highly involved. Eighteen university faculty members participated in a day-long standard setting for a general education communications test. In Round 1, faculty set initial cut-scores for each of four student learning objectives. In Rounds…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Teacher Participation, Standard Setting, Academic Standards
